📄Работа №69206

Тема: THE PROCUREMENT STAGE OF THE PUBLIC- PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS IN HEALTCARE AS THE SOURCE OF PROJECT’S CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS

📝
Тип работы Магистерская диссертация
📚
Предмет менеджмент
📄
Объем: 99 листов
📅
Год: 2016
👁️
Просмотров: 105
4950 руб.
🛒 Купить работу
Не подходит эта работа?
Закажите новую по вашим требованиям
Узнать цену на написание
ℹ️ Настоящий учебно-методический информационный материал размещён в ознакомительных и исследовательских целях и представляет собой пример учебного исследования. Не является готовым научным трудом и требует самостоятельной переработки.
📋 Содержание 📖 Введение ✅ Заключение 📕 Литература 🖼 Скриншоты 🔍 Похожие 🛒 Купить

📋 Содержание

Introduction 8
1. PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS: STAGES, RISKS, AND CRITICAL
SUCCESS FACTORS 11
1.1 Concept of Public Private Partnerships 11
1.2 Start of PPP development 12
1.3 Reasons for the choice PPP project 12
1.4 Forms of PPP 14
1.5 Stages of PPP projects 15
Procurement stage 17
1.5 Risks of PPP projects 19
1.6 Critical success factors of PPP projects 23
2. COMPARISON OF COUNTRIES’ EXPERIENCE IN ORGANISATION OF THE
PROCUREMENT STAGE OF PPP PROJECT 30
2.1 Countries’ environment: implications for PPPs 30
2.1.1 Russia 31
2.1.2 Japan 32
2.1.3 India 33
2.1.4 Canada 33
2.2 Methodology 35
2.3 Projects description 37
2.3.1 Russia 37
2.3.2 Canada 44
2.3.3 Japan 46
2.3.4 India 47
2.4 Cross-case analysis 48
2.4.1 Transparent and efficient procurement process 48
2.4.2 Competitive procurement 57
2.4.3 Well organized and committed public agency 58
2.4.4 Thorough and realistic assessment of costs and benefits 60
2.5 Results: Procurement stage as a source of critical success factors 63
2.6 Recommendations 65
Conclusion 66
Limitations and further research 66
List of references Ошибка! Закладка не определена.
Appendix 1. PPP projects in healthcare in Russia 75
Appendix 2. PPP projects in healthcare in Canada, Japan and India 77
Appendix 3 Awarding criteria on case projects* 78

📖 Введение

The initial reason for the emergence of public-private partnership (PPP) projects was reduction of the public sector financial burden through bringing in private investment for public services and facilities (Grimsey, Lewis, 2005). Nowadays cost reduction and allocation of risks and responsibilities are the main reasons for the implementation of PPP project as well as introducing expertise of the private sector to public services/assets provision.
Lifecycle of PPP project consists of several stages: project identification, preparation, procurement, implementation and ownership. The procurement stage as one of the key phases of the project implementation was selected for the further analysis. The choice of the private partner can influence results of the project implementation and it is particularly interesting which factors (later on we call them critical success factors or CSF) should be met at the procurement stage in order to mitigate risks arising during determination of the private partner and project implementation. Thereby, the topic of this thesis is the procurement stage of the public-private partnership project as a source of project's critical success factors. This research field is attractive for scholars from various parts of the world, and they are interested in the identification of the critical success factors at various stages of the project (Qiao et al, 2001; Li et al, 2005; Chan et al, 2010, Cheung et al, 2012; Chou et al, 2015).
PPPs in healthcare gain higher recognition and are more preferable than traditional public procurement options due to several reasons. The first one is attraction of private funding, then combination of various services and stages of the project (designing, building and delivery of health services). Under traditional public procurement private partner only performs construction functions and transfers the object to government. Consequently, it has fewer incentives to increase quality of the infrastructure object.
Following the 2007-2008 global financial crises there has been an increasing interest in the public-private partnership (PPP) policy by governments in both developed and developing countries. They issue new laws on public procurement, concessions and other closely related subjects in order to increase efficiency and effectiveness of PPP projects. Each year at least several countries issue either new legislative documents that aim to improve the situation in PPP or guides on PPP project implementation. In Russia in 2016 the new law on PPP was enacted.
Public infrastructure development is one of the top priorities in Russian economy since it can raise living standards, level of innovations, address problems that face the country, its regions and towns. There is a great demand for infrastructure development and interest of public sector in PPP projects in social and healthcare sector. The huge need to attract more private investments and reconstruct existing healthcare facilities exists in Russia. The level of necessary investments equals 0.8-1 trillion rubbles and government assumes that around 200-300 billion rubles can be attracted via PPPs.
Private sector is also interested in participation in infrastructure projects. And legislation on PPP is continuously developing that aims to improve attractiveness. However, PPPs in Russia are still at the initial stage of development in healthcare. Russia has only 38 PPP projects in healthcare from the total sample of 1096 projects (that is around 4%). At the same time number of PPP projects in healthcare in the world is continuously growing and other developed countries have reach experience in the PPP projects realization. Currently the share of PPP projects in healthcare is around 30-40% in Canada and UK.
Therefore the research gap identified in this paper is the following: Paradigm of PPP in Russia is still forming and international experience can help to avoid some traps and to foster the development process.
This work aims to answer the following questions:
• How to identify the CSFs of procurement stage of Russian PPP projects?
• Which risks can be mitigated by management of the critical success factors at the procurement stage?
• How to improve existing policies in PPP area to have higher rate of successfully implemented PPP projects?
The object of this research is healthcare PPP projects in Russia and other countries. The research subject is identification and management of critical success factors that contribute to the mitigation of risks and success of the PPP projects.
The main goal of the thesis is to increase effectiveness and efficiency of PPPs in healthcare by identification and governance of the critical success factors (CSFs) at the procurement stage
In order to achieve this goal the following objectives had been set:
• To identify critical success factors of PPP project at the procurement stage;
• To conduct cross-case analysis of successful and problematic projects from Russia and overseas to identify differences among CSFs at the procurement stage;
• To design the procurement stage of the PPP project such a way to minimize the risks at the following stages of PPP project realization;
• To make suggestions on improvement of Russian Federation public-private partnership policy.
In order to answer on the research questions data on infrastructural PPP projects in healthcare sector in Russia, Canada, Japan and India were collected. After that these cases were analyzed and compared in order to identify differences and similarities that can be attributed to the successful project implementation. Access to information on these projects varies from country to country. In Canada all project information together with documentation is disclosed on the official websites on PPP projects in Canada while in Russia the access is more restricted and information is spread over websites of different Ministries depending on the region.
This paper consists of 2 chapters. The first chapter introduces the research topic, provides key definitions, introduces PPP project concept, stages of the PPP projects with a focus on the procurement stage, risks arising during this stage and next ones, critical success factors that can mitigate these risks, value chain as a method for risks identification and management of the critical success factors. In this part the list of CSFs that should be relevant for Russian environment is identified and these CSFs are further analyzed in the second chapter.
The second chapter describes environment relevant to PPP implementation in the countries of interest. Then it introduces methodology of the research and presents results of the analysis of the PPP projects in Russia, Canada, Japan and India on each of the identified CSFs.
This paper should be useful for those stakeholders who are connected to PPP projects implementation. It introduces recommendations on the basis of CSFs identified and their effect on risks mitigation. It also helps to identify the directions for improvement of Russian PPP regulations and policies.

Возникли сложности?

Нужна качественная помощь преподавателя?

👨‍🎓 Помощь в написании
🎓 Дипломные 📘 Магистерские 📙 Диссертации 📗 Курсовые 📝 Статьи 📄 ВКР

✅ Заключение

The results of the analysis conducted are divided by CSFs in order to assess the relevance of each of the critical success factors for the project implementation in Russia and other countries.
Transparency in the procurement process. One of the characteristics of transparency is availability of tender documentation and other documents related to the PPP project. We can see the following tendency. There is almost no information on PPP projects in Russia. This information is allocated among absolutely different sources. Access to most documentation of more than 50% of the projects is limited and in all cases just a main part of the project documentation is published. If we take Canada or India then we see that they have all information in one place with all the news releases, project documentation, schedules, requests and evaluations, results of the project implementation. So level of transparency in Russia is lower. Besides in Canada almost all projects involve assessment by fairness advisor, consulting companies while in Russia their services are used rarely and the lower scale of the projects in general partially determines this situation.
Competitive procurement process. This characteristic is also not typical for Russian PPP projects. However there are not so many private investors who are able to construct and operate healthcare units dedicated to provision of services of specific function. Like with example of Hemodialysis center. The company “Klinika sovremennoy meditsyny HD” was the only private company operating on that market. So it can be more important to have clear project documentation to limit hazardous behavior of the private partner. Canadian project have high number of bidders (around 3 bidders on average reaching request of proposal and submitting their application form)
Moreover, highest bid-lowest bid scoring rule should not be applied in case of low competition because it creates incentives to improve offer only on one criterion because then private partner will win the contest even if the price is extremely high or quality is low. In addition, more than two awarding criteria should be used to avoid hazardous behavior. Analysis of this rule revealed that if at least one criterion has weight of more than 0.5 then private partner would have no incentives to improve its offer on other criteria. Consequently it is necessary to have more than two awarding criteria in tender documentation. In addition if there are only two bidders then in case of similar scores on all criteria but one, the bidder that suggests gets just a little bit lower scores on several criteria gets 0 scores on them and looses in the contest. Therefore this rule also should not be applied in case of low competition.
Well-organized and committed public agency. PPP partnerships in healthcare in Russia is relatively new concept, they started to appear in the late 2000s. However, more and more regions of Russia introduce recommendations or policies on the PPPs in order to increase attractiveness of such a form for private investor. Most investors are unwilling to enter PPPs because of the high risks and these risks can be partially mitigated by the legislation and recommendations. In addition creation of specialized units or center integrating information on all projects, accumulating experience and sharing best practices like it is done in Canada might improve the attractiveness of projects and rate of projects successfully implemented.
Thorough and realistic assessment of the costs and benefits. This factor is crucial for the successful accomplishment of the project. This paper introduced several cases where private partner could not meet the predetermined plan on procedures or number of patients because the demand was lower than expected. But since the profit of private partner depended only on government payments it did not have enough motivation to improve the quality of services provided or to change the current conditions in order to increase number of patients. The outcome of such a situation was a buy out of the infrastructural object and transferring all operating activities to a public partner. If costs, risks and benefits are assessed in advance and included in project agreements then it is possible to avoid such situations.
All this critical success factors at the procurement stage (transparent procurement, competitive procurement, thorough and realistic assessment of the costs and benefits, well organized and committed public agency) can contribute to risks mitigation of the healthcare project. They affect it through higher quality of tender documentation, higher involvement and interest of the public partner and usage of previous experience, increasing awareness of private partners and greater number of bids, reduction of hazard behavior, creating more attractive investment environment and as a result attracting more bidders and possibility to make more accurate selection of the partner. Thereby they also reduce some medical and operational risks.

Нужна своя уникальная работа?
Срочная разработка под ваши требования
Рассчитать стоимость
ИЛИ
Поиск аналога

📕 Список литературы

1. Acerete B., Stafford A. and Stapleton P. (2012) New development: New global health care PPP developments—a critique of the success story. Public Money & Management, 32 (4), 311-314.
2. Akintoye, A., Beck, M., Hardcastle, C., Chinyio, E. and Asenova, D. (2001). Framework for Risk Assessment and Management of Private Finance Initiative Projects. Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University
3. Archive [In Russian]. Retrieved on 2016, February 22 from: http://mzio.tatarstan.ru/rus/arhiv.htm
4. Arthur Andersen and Enterprise LSE, (2000). Value for Money Drivers in the Private Financial Initiative, the Treasury Task Force
5. Babatunde, S.O., Opawole, A. and Akinsiku, O.E. (2012). Critical success factors in public-private partnership (PPP) on infrastructure delivery in Nigeria. Journal Of Facilities Management, 10(3), 212-225.
6. Barrows, D., MacDonald, H. I., Supapol, A. B., Dalton-Jez, O., & Harvey-Rioux, S. (2012). Public-private partnerships in Canadian health care: A case study of the Brampton Civic Hospital. OECD Journal On Budgeting, 2012(1), 21-34.
7. Bing, L., Akintoye, A., Edwards, P.J. and Hardcastle, C. (2005). The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK. International Journal Of Project Management, 23, 25¬35.
8. Bogolib, T. M. International Experience and World Tendencies of Developing State¬Private Partnership. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21 (3), 360
9. Boyfield, K. (1992). Private Sector Funding of Public Sector Infrastructure, Public Money & Management. Oxford. 12 (2). pp.41-46.
10. Brodie, M. J. (1995). Public/Private Joint Ventures: The Government as Partner - Bane or Benefit? Real Estate Issues. Chicago. 20 (2). pp.33-39.
11. Bullen, C. V. & Rockart, J. F. (1981). A primer on critical success factors. Cambridge, MA: Center for Information Systems Research, MIT.
12. Canadian PPP project database (2016, May) The Canadian Council for Public-Private Partnerships. Retrieved from:
13. CEC (2008). Commission Interpretative Communication on the application of Community law on Public Procurement and Concessions to Institutionalised Public-Private Partnerships Brussels, Belgium: Commission of the European Communities.
14. Chan, A. C., Lam, P. I., Chan, D. M., Cheung, E., & Yongjian, K. (2010). Critical Success Factors for PPPs in Infrastructure Developments: Chinese Perspective. Journal Of Construction Engineering & Management, 136(5), 484-494.
15. Cheung, E., Chan, A., Lam, P., Chan, D., & Yongjian, K. (2012). A comparative study of critical success factors for public private partnerships (PPP) between Mainland China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Facilities, 30(13), 647-666. doi:10.1108/02632771211273132
16. Chou, J., and Pramudawardhani, D. 2015. "Cross-country comparisons of key drivers, critical success factors and risk allocation for public-private partnership projects." International Journal Of Project Management, 33 (5), 1136-1150.
17. CII and KPMG (2009). The Emerging Role of PPP in Indian Healthcare Sector. Policy Paper, Retrieved on 2016, March 10 from: www.ibef.org/download/PolicyPaper.pdf
18. Commentary: Policy framework on the governance of major infrastructure projects of Quebec, Politique-cadre sur la gouvernance des grands projets d'infrastructure- Quebec, 2010.
19. Daniel, D.R. (1961). Management information crisis. Harvard Business Review, (Sept- Oct), 111-116.
20. Dini, F., Pacini, R. and Valetti, T. (2006) Scoring rules. Handbook of procurement [Text] / ed. by Nicola Dimitri, Gustavo Piga and Giancarlo Spagnolo. - Cambridge, UK [et al.]: Cambridge University Press, p. 347-380.
21. EIB (European Investment Bank) (2004). The EIB’s Role in Public-Private Partnerships
(PPPs), European Investment Bank, Luxembourg,
www.eib.org/Attachments/thematic/eib_ppp_en.pdf.
22. Engel, E., Fischer, R., and Galetovic, A. (2007). The Basic Public Finance of Public¬Private Partnerships, NBER Working Paper No. 13284, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
23. EPEC (2011) The Guide to Guidance.How to Prepare, Procure and Deliver PPP Projects. Available at: http://www.eib.org/epec/resources/guide-to-guidance-en
24. European Commission (2003). Guidelines for successful public- private partnerships. Brussels: Directorate General Regional Policy.
25. Federal Law № 115-FZ of July 21, 2005 «On concession agreements»
26. Federal Law № 224-FZ of July 13, 2015 «On public-private partnership and municipal¬private partnership in the Russian Federation and amending certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation»
27. FHWA (2010). Public-Private Partnership Concessions for Highway Projects: A Primer. - US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, October.
28. FHWA (2012) Risk Assessment for Public-Private Partnerships: A Primer. - US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, December.
29. Finnerty, J. D. (1996). Project Financing: Asset-Based Financial Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
30. Fourie, F. N., & Burger, P. (2001). Fiscal Implications of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs). South African Journal Of Economics, 69(1), 147-167.
31. Frilet, M. (1997). Some Universal Issues in BOT Projects for Public Infrastructure, The International Construction Law Review. 14 (4). pp.499-512.
32. Garvin, M., Bosso D. (2008). Assessing the effectiveness of infra- structure public¬private partnership programs and projects. Public Works Management and Policy. 13 (2), 162¬178.
33. Gentry B. and Fernandez, L. (1997) Evolving Public-Private Partnerships: General Themes and Urban Water Examples. Globalisation and the Environment: Perspectives from OECD and Dynamic Non-Member Economies. OECD, Paris. pp.19-25. http://www.undp.org/pppue/.
34. Gilbert, E. (2009). Failing grade for public-private partnership hospitals. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 180(4), 380-380.
35. Grimsey, D., & Lewis, M. K. (2005). Are Public Private Partnerships value for money? Evaluating alternative approaches and comparing academic and practitioner views. Accounting Forum, 29(4), 345-378.
36. Grunert, K. G., & Ellegaard, C. (1992). The concept of key success factors: theory and method (pp. 505-24). MAPP. Haryana, India: Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Policy
37. Hambros, SG. (1999). Public-Private Partnerships for Highways: Experience, Structure, Financing, Applicability and Comparative Assessment. Canada.
38. Healthcare UK: Public Private Partnerships, UK Trade&Investment, 2013
39. HM Treasury. 2012. A New Approach to Public Private Partnerships. Available at http://cdn.Hm- treasury.gov.uk/infrastructure_new_approach_to_public_private_parnerships_051212. pdf
40. Hodge G. (2004) Risks in Public-Private Partnerships: Shifting, Sharing or Shirking? Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 26(2), 155-179
41. Humber River Hospital. Retrieved on 2016, February 26 from: http://www.infrastructureontario.ca/Templates/Projects.aspx?id=2147484327&langtype=1033
42. Hurst, C. & Reeves, E. (2004). “An Economic Analysis of Ireland's First Public-Private Partnership.” The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(5): 379-388.
43. Hwang, B., Xianbo, Z., and Gay, M.J.S. (2013). Public private partnership projects in Singapore: Factors, critical risks and preferred risk allocation from the perspective of contractors. International Journal Of Project Management, 31 (3), 424-433.
44. Infrastructure Canada (2012). Infrastructure Spotlight: Improving Canada’s Infrastructure Through Public-Private Partnerships. Available at http://www.p3canada.ca/_files/P3_eng.pdf
45. International Financial Services London (2003), Public Private Partnerships: UK Expertise for International Markets, London: IFSL
46. Irvine, R., and H. Hall. 2015. "Factors, frameworks and theory: a review of the information systems literature on success factors in project management." Information Research 20 (3)
47. Ismail, S. (2013). Critical success factors of public private partnership (PPP) implementation in Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Journal Of Business Administration 5 (1), 6-19.
48. Ivanov A. On the new approach to the risks’ identification in the projects of public¬private partnership. Working Paper #1(E) -2015. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb, 2015.
49. Jefferies, M., Gameson, R. and Rowlinson, S. (2002). Critical Success Factors of the BOOT Procurement System: Reflection from the Stadium Australia Case Study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 9 (4). pp.352-361.
50. Jin (2016, April 07) Problems and tasks of PPP/PFI projects in Japan [PPT]. GSOM SPBU
51. Jones, I., Zamani, H. and Reehal, R. (1996). Financing Models for New Transport Infrastructure. OPEC, Luxembourg.
52. Kanter, R. M. (1999). From Spare Change to Real Change, Harvard Business Review. Boston. 77 (2). pp.122-132.
53. Ke, Y., Wang, S., Chan, A. P., & Lam, P. T. (2010). Preferred risk allocation in China’s public-private partnership (PPP) projects. International Journal Of Project Management, 28(5), 482-492. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.08.007
54. Kwak, Y. H., YingYi, C., & Ibbs, C. W. (2009). Towards a Comprehensive Understanding of Public Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Development. California Management Review, 51(2), 51-78.
55. Moszoro, M. W., & Spiller, P. T. (2012). Third-party opportunism and the nature oj public contracts (No. w18636). National Bureau of Economic Research
56. Mustafa, A. (1999). Public-Private Partnership: An Alternative Institutional Model for Implementing the Private Financial Initiative in the Provision of Transport Infrastructure. The Journal of Project Finance. Summer. pp.64-79.
57. National Commentary: The Public-Private Partnership Law Review, Chapter 5: Canada, Fasken Martineau, Law Business Research, April 2015
58. Nephrology Centre Haldwani innaugrated, December 21, 2011 Retrieved on 2016,
February 27
from: http://cell.upppc.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=150:nephrology- centre-haldwani-commences-operation&catid=60:project-monitoring&Itemid=46
59. Database of Infrastucture projects in India. Retrieved on 2016, February 27 from: https ://infrastructureindia.gov.in
60. Ministry of Land and Property Relationships in the Republic of Tatarstan. Retrieved on 2016, February 1 from:: http://mzio.tatarstan.ru
61. OECD (2007), OECD Principles for Private Sector Participation in Infrastructure, OECD Publishing, Paris.
62. OECD (2008). Public-Private Partnership: in pursuit of risk sharing and value for money. Principles and Practice of Public Procurement (2012). - The Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply (CIPS) and The Institute for Public Procurement (NIGP). Available at http://principlesandpractices.org/
63. Osei-Kyei, R., & Chan, A. P. (2015). Review of studies on the Critical Success Factors for Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects from 1990 to 2013. International Journal Of Project Management, 33(6), 1335-1346. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.02.008
64. Patil, N. A., Tharun, D., & Laishram, B. (2016). Infrastructure development through PPPs in India: criteria for sustainability assessment. Journal Of Environmental Planning & Management, 59(4), 708-729. doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1038337
65. Porter M., Teisberg E. (2006) Redefining Health Care: Creating Value-Based Competition on Results, Harvard Business School Press.
66. Porter, Michael E. (1985). Competitive Advantage. Free Press.
67. Potential Benefits of Public Private Partnerships, URL: http://ppp.worldbank.org/public- private-partnership/overview/ppp-objectives, Retrieved on 02.03.2016
68. PPP in health care in the spotlight of the Russian Federation (2015, April 7) [In Russian] Unified information system on PPPs in RF. Retrieved on 2016, March 15 from: http://www.pppi.ru/news/gchp-v-zdravoohranenii-v-centre-vnimaniya-pravitelstva- rossiyskoy-federacii
69. Projects database (2016, May). Unified information system on PPPs in RF. Retrieved from: http://www.pppi.ru/projects
70. Qiao, L., Wang, S.Q., Tiong, R.L.K. and Chan, T.S. (2001). Framework for Critical Success
71. Rating of Regions on PPP Development (2015). The Association “Public-Private Partnership Development Center” (PPP Development Center). Retrieved on 25.03.2016 from: http://pppcenter.ru/analitika/reiting.html
72. Reference to question 4 of the agenda of the meeting of the Coordination Council of Russian Ministry for Public-Private Partnerships "On the practice of implementation of infrastructure projects of public-private partnership in the health sector on the example of the specific subjects of the Russian Federation" [In Russian] Retrieved on 2016, February 21 from: ttps://www.rosminzdrav.ru
73. Rockart, J. F. (1979). Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Business Review, (March-April)
74. Round table “Risk Management in PPP Projects in Health Care” (2015, February 10) GSOM
75. Shaoul, J., A. Stafford, and P. Stapleton. 2007. “Partnerships and the role of financial advi- sors: Private control over public policy?” Policy & Politics 35 (3): 479-495.
76. Siemiatycki, M. (2015). Public-Private Partnerships in Canada: Reflections on twenty years of practice. Canadian Public Administration, 58(3), 343-362. doi:10.1111/capa.12119
77. Stein, S. W. (1995). Construction Financing and BOT projects, International Business Lawyer. International Bar Association. 23 (4). pp.173-180.
78. Tender documentation and results [In Russian]. Retrieved on 2016, February 22 from: http://mzio.tatarstan.ru/rus/konkursnaya-dokumentatsiya-i-itogi.htm
79. The World Bank, (2016). Sector Snapshots. Retrieved February 24, 2016, from: http://ppi.worldbank.org/ppinew/snapshots/sector/electricity
80. Tingting, L., & Wilkinson, S. (2011). Adopting innovative procurement techniques: Obstacles and drivers for adopting public private partnerships in New Zealand. Construction Innovation, 11(4), 452-469. doi:10.1108/14714171111175918
81. Tkachenko M.V., Kongulov A.S., Dolgov A.A. (2014). Рейтинг регионов ГЧП-2014. Развитие государственно-частного партнерства в субъектах Российской Федерации. - М.: Центр развития государственно-частного партнерства
82. Tshiki Pr, Masibonge1 (2015). Critical success factors for infrastructure construction proj ects in South Africa." Journal Of The South African Institution Of Civil Engineering 23 (6), 19-24.
83. Van Ham, H., & Koppenjan, J. (2001) “Building Public-Private Partnerships: Assessing and Managing Risks in Port Development.” Public Management Review, 3(4): 50 93-616.
84. Vinogradov, D, Shadrina, E., and Kokareva L. (2014) PUBLIC PROCUREMENT MECHANISMS FOR PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS. Journal Of Public Procurement 14 (4), 538-566.
85. Yongjian, K., ShouQing, W., Chan, A. C., & Cheung, E. (2009). Research Trend of Public-Private Partnership in Construction Journals. Journal Of Construction Engineering & Management, 135(10), 1076-1086. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:10(1076)
86. Исследование «Развитие государственно-частного партнерства в России в 2015¬2016 годах. Рейтинг регионов по уровню развития ГЧП» / Ассоциация «Центр развития ГЧП», Министерство экономического развития Российской Федерации. - М.: Ассоциация «Центр развития ГЧП», 2016. - 36 с.

🖼 Скриншоты

🛒 Оформить заказ

⚡ Работу высылаем в течении 5 минут после оплаты.

🔍 ПОХОЖИЕ РАБОТЫ ПО ТЕМЕ

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PROJECT COST FORECASTING METHODS BASED ON EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2017 г. 5680 руб. Influence of state ownership of oil&gas companies equity on the level of participation in foreign projects Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2018 г. 5650 руб. RECOMPOSITION OF THE VALUE CHAIN OF RUSSIAN COMMERCIAL AIRLINES IN CURRENT ENVIRONMENT Дипломные работы, ВКР менеджмент 2024 г. 4750 руб. A Model of Oligopoly based on a Network Approach Магистерская диссертация информатика 2016 г. 5200 руб. A Model of Oligopoly based on a Network Approach Магистерская диссертация математика 2016 г. 5600 руб. Доверие потребителя к органическим продуктам питания на рынках России и Германии Consumer trust in organic food on the German and Russian markets Магистерская диссертация социология 2017 г. 4950 руб. The Transition to Cleaner Fuel Technologies in India: Assessing middle to high income consumer’ attitudes and willingness to pay Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2024 г. 5500 руб. Corporate IT products development strategy in the company X Бакалаврская работа менеджмент 2024 г. 4900 руб. Application of country brand for tourism product promotion: Russian evidence Магистерская диссертация туризм 2018 г. 5700 руб. Development of a Website Classification Model for Quiet Media Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2022 г. 4600 руб.

📎 МАГИСТЕРСКАЯ ДИССЕРТАЦИЯ ПО ПРЕДМЕТУ «МЕНЕДЖМЕНТ»

Найдено работ: 1104

Развитие инструментов управления профессиональным отбором кадров в АО "Российские космические системы" Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2023 г. 5900 руб. Управление процессом формирования эмоциональной устойчивости студентов Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2025 г. 5800 руб. Управление инновационным развитием в малом и среднем бизнесе на примере внедрения электронных платежных систем Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2024 г. 5900 руб. Проектное управление здравоохранением в Томской области Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2023 г. 4880 руб. Управление финансовой грамотностью детей Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2023 г. 4975 руб. Кросс-отраслевой бенчмаркинг элементов корпоративного управления организацией Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2022 г. 4955 руб. Организация бизнес-стратегий в международных компаниях Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2022 г. 4950 руб. Управление городской средой в условиях цифровой трансформации и демографических вызовов Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2023 г. 4835 руб. Совершенствование системы нематериального стимулирования персонала на предприятии Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2023 г. 4820 руб. Система управления договорной деятельностью как основа повышения эффективности компании Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2023 г. 4955 руб. УПРАВЛЕНИЕ РАЗРАБОТКОЙ И РЕАЛИЗАЦИЕЙ УСЛУГ В СФЕРЕ РАЗВИТИЯ ЧЕЛОВЕЧЕСКИХ РЕСУРСОВ Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2019 г. 4950 руб. СОБЫТИЙНЫЙ МЕНЕДЖМЕНТ В СФЕРЕ ГОСТЕПРИИМСТВА Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2023 г. 4895 руб. РАЗРАБОТКА МАРКЕТИНГОВОЙ СТРАТЕГИИ ДЛЯ МЕДУЧРЕЖДЕНИЯ УСЛУГ ЗДРАВООХРАНЕНИЯ Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2021 г. 4980 руб. СИСТЕМА МОТИВАЦИИ И СТИМУЛИРОВАНИЯ ПЕРСОНАЛА ПРЕДПРИЯТИЯ В УСЛОВИЯХ ЦИФРОВИЗАЦИИ Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2021 г. 4815 руб. ОПТИМИЗАЦИЯ ЛОГИСТИЧЕСКИХ ПРОЦЕССОВ И УПРАВЛЕНИЯ ЗАТРАТАМИ НА ПРЕДПРИЯТИИ НЕФТЕГАЗОВОГО СЕКТОРА Магистерская диссертация менеджмент 2017 г. 4910 руб.
📋 Содержание 📖 Введение ✅ Заключение 📕 Литература 🖼 Скриншоты 🔍 Похожие 🛒 Купить ⬆️

Оценка стоимости

Это краткая форма заказа. После ее заполнения вы перейдете на полную форму заказа работы

Каталог работ (208121)

Поиск работ


©2026 Cервис помощи студентам в выполнении работ
.