LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES 5
INTRODUCTION 6
1. LITERATURE REVIEW 8
1.1 Valuation theory 8
1.2 Private equity industry in Russia 17
2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND DESIGN 21
2.1 Research problem: test of applicability of Residual Earnings Model for valuation of non-traded
companies 21
2.2 Research goal and objectives 24
2.3 Research questions 26
2.4 Research hypotheses 29
2.5 Formalization of the Residual Earnings Model 31
2.6 Data collection 36
3. EMPIRICAL RESULTS OF APPLICATION RESIDUAL EARNINGS MODEL 38
3.1 Comparison of IFRS-based and RAS-based valuation models 38
3.2 Test of the regression model with different required rates of return on equity 48
3.3 Application of the model for IPO price estimating 50
CONCLUSIONS 56
LIST OF REFERENCES 58
The problem of corporate valuation and estimation of fundamental value of a firm remains unresolved in finance literature. Although there are many valuation techniques that can be effectively applied to companies on developed markets, valuation of the companies operating on developing markets can be challenging. Most of the valuation methods require well- developed financial market and large number of traded companies with comparable characteristics. Valuation process of private equity deals and non-traded companies on developing markets can be even more complicated. Even though many of the valuation techniques applicable to public companies can be used to value private companies as well, estimating the true intrinsic value of a private company can be a challenging task.
The topic of the research paper is: “Private equity in Russia: application of accounting-based valuation model for non-traded companies”. The relevance of the research topic is determined by specifics of Russian private equity market and organizational structure of non-public companies. According to the information reflected in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities there are approximately 151 000 stock companies in Russia. At the same time, only 300 Russian joint-stock companies are listed on the stock exchange and about 50 of them are traded on a regular basis. Thus, most of the Russian join-stock companies are non-traded ones and it is very difficult to evaluate fair market value for these companies. Regarding facts mentioned above, accounting-based valuation approach can serve as simple and effective valuation method applicable for private equity deals and non-traded companies.
The goal of this research paper is to test reliability of valuation model based on accounting data. In order to achieve stated goal two major tasks should be done. Firstly, it is necessaryto test whether accounting information is relevant to market values of Russian companies. Secondy, it is important to define whether accounting-based valuation model can be used for implementing unified valuation approach for non-traded companies in Russia.
The object of the research - Russian companies that performed IPOs. The subject of this research paper is applicability of accounting-based valuation method for assessing values of non-traded companies in Russia.
The practical research questions: 1) Do the value of residual earnings and equity book value have explanatory power over real market values of the Russian companies? 2) Does the IFRS-based Residual Earnings model is more effective in estimating market capitalization of the companies than the RAS-based model? 3) Does the accounting-based valuation approach can be used for estimating IPO prices?
Objectives of the research:
• to provide description and formalization of the valuation model;
• to conduct regression analysis;
• to execute analysis of the regression descriptive statistics;
• to apply regression coefficients for valuation of Russian companies;
• to compare results derived from the application of the model to actual values;
• to make conclusions about efficiency and applicability of the model.
The research paper is structured as follows. The first chapter is devoted to the critical overview of corporate valuation theory and applicability of different valuation techniques for valuation of private equity deals and non-traded companies in Russia. The emphasis is put on accounting-based valuation methods, Residual Income model in particular. The second chapter defines methodology of a current study and elaborates further on the research goal, objectives, questions, hypotheses. Empirical results of application of Residual Earnings model are presented and discussed in the third chapter. The summary of key findings, as well as research limitations and further directions, are outlined in the conclusion section.
Nowadays the problem of developing a unified valuation approach, suitable for most sectors of the Russian economy, applicable to non-traded companies and private equity deals is of great importance. This problem is especially significant because the the valuation approaches used for private companies can not be applied to companies operating on Russian market due to the lack of comparable firms and transactions, poor liquidity and transparency. The absence of such valuation method inhibits the consolidation of holding structures, transactions with shares of non-traded companies, divestments, and the development of private equity market. The persistent problems in valuation of Russian companies have attracted increased attention of researchers and practitioners likewise and initiated a number of studies. This research is logical sequel of previous works in which authors studied the reliability of accounting-based models, in particular, Residual Earnings Model.
Empirical tests of accounting-based valuation model proved that accounting data from consolidated financial statements prepared under IFRS allows estimating market capitalization of Russian companies more precisely than RAS accounting data. Even though in some cases the discrepancy between model estimations and observable market values can be significant, Residual Earnings model still remains a useful tool for assessing the fundamental value of a company.
The regression analysis revealed that various required rates of return on equity can be utilized for valuation and can produce meaningful results. Usage of different required rates of return can be helpful for implementing unified valuation approach. It allows developing correctional factors depending on the reason of valuation (IPO, consolidation, divestments etc). Those correctional coefficients will improve the accuracy of the valuation process.
The results of application of the Residual Earnings model for IPO price estimation allow making a conclusion about applicability of the model. It is unlikely that the model can be used by owners of the company for determination of initial price level during the IPO because the mismatch between the price estimated with model and market prices can be significant. However, the usefulness of the model is associated with the opportunity for outside investors to evaluate the fundamental value of a company with publicly available accounting data. In such way, investors may measure potential benefits from participation in IPO. In addition, this valuation approach can be used by key shareholders for determining IPO timing.
From the theoretical point of view, the results of this research contribute to explaining the relevance of accounting data to value of a company and interdependence between market capitalization its fundamental value. From the practical point of view, the test of applicability of the model demonstrated its practical importance for non-traded companies valuation. Accounting-based valuation methods such as Residual Earnings model can be used for implementing unified valuation approach for Russian companies. However, further tests with more representative and broad sample are needed.
The research presented in this paper is interim step towards the developing of an adequate valuation model for the Russian market companies. Further research may be conducted in the following areas. Firstly, it is necessary to conduct research over non-accounting factors influencing the market capitalization of the company. Secondly, the connection between required rate of return on equity and market capitalization should be studied and fundamental principles of its determining should be developed.
Abarbanell, J. and Bushee, B. (1997). Fundamental Analysis, Future earnings and Stock Prices. Journal of Accounting Research, pp. 1-24.
Ackerlof G. (1970). The Market for Lemons: Quality, Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 84 (3), pp. 488-500
Akbar S., and A. W. Stark (2003). Deflators, Net Shareholder Cash Flows, Dividends, Capital Contributions and Estimated Models of Corporate Valuation, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 30, pp. 1211-1233
Alford A. (1992). The Effect of the Set of Comparable Firms on the Accuracy of the Price¬Earnings Valuation Method, Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 94-108
Barth, M.E., Beaver, W.H., Hand, J.M., and Landsman, W.R. (1999). Accruals, Cash Flows, and Equity Values, Review of Accounting Studies 3, pp. 205-229
Bar-Yosef S., Callen J., Livnat J. (1996). Modelling Dividends, Earnings, and Book Value Equity: An Empirical Investigation of the Ohlson Valuation Dynamics. Review of Accounting Studies, pp.207-224
Begley J., Feltham G. (2002). The Relation between Market Values, Earnings Forecasts, and Reported Earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research 19 (1), pp.1-48
Benninga S. Z. and Sarig O. H. (1997). Corporate finance - a valuation approach. McGraw Hill
Bernard V. (1995). The Feltham Ohlson framework: Implications for empiricists, Contemporary Accounting Research, vol. 11, pp. 733—747
Bhojraj S., and Lee, C. (2002). Who is my peer? A valuation-based approach to the selection of comparable firms, Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 407-39
Biddle G., Chen P., Zhang G. (2001). When Capital Follows Profitability: Non-linear Residual Income Dynamics. Review of Accounting Studies 6.pp. 229-265
Brealey R., and Meyers S. (2003). Principles of Corporate Finance, Sixth edition. McGraw Hill
Bukhvalov A. V., Volkov D., Bandalyuk O., Berezinets I., Garanina T., Ilina Yu. (2012). Corporate Governance: Issues of Application and Evaluation of Russian Companies. St.Petersburg, Publishing Centre “Graduate School of Management”
Bukhvalov A.V., Volkov D.L. (2005a). Research of the relationship between fundamental value and market capitalization of Russian companies. Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg State University. Management (4): 99-117. (1): 26-44
Bukhvalov A. V., Akulaeva E. A. (2014). Empirical Fundamental Valuation of Russian Companies: Searching For Strategic Value V.12, no.2
Cardullo, M.W. (1999.) Technological Entrepreneurism: Enterprise, Formation, Financing, and Growth. Baldock, England: Research Studies Press Ltd
Cooper C. L., Argyris C. (1998). The concise Blackwell encyclopedia of management, WileyBlackwell. Malder, Mass: Blackwell Business
Correia C., Flynn D., Uliana E. and Wormald, M. (2003). Financial Management Fifth Edition. Juta and Co Ltd.
Damodaran, A. (1996). Investment valuation: Tools and techniques for determining the valueof any asset. University edition, John Wiley and Sons
Edwards E., Bell P. (1961). The Theory and Measurement of Business Income. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA
Fama E. F.. and K. R. French (1998). Taxes, Financing Decisions, and Firm Value, Journal of Finance, Vol. 53, pp. 819-43
Fama E., and French K. (1995). Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Returns, Journal of Finance (March), pp. 131-155
Fama E.F., Miller M. H. (1972). The Theory of Finance, The Journal of Finance, vol. 29, no. 3 (Jun., 1974), pp. 1031-1033
Feltham G., Ohlson J. (1995). Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (2): 689-731
Flegm E H. (1989). The limitations of accounting. Accounting Horizons, September, pp.90-97
Frankel R., and Lee C. (1995). Accounting Valuation, Market Expectation, and The Book-to- Market effect. University of Michigan, Unpublished
Gompers, Lerner. (2000) Money chasing deals? The impact of fund inflows on private equity valuation. Journal of Financial economics vol. 55 (2) pp. 281-325
Hand J. R. M., and Landsman W. R. (2005). The Pricing of Dividends in Equity Valuation, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(3) & (4)
Holland J. (1998). Private Corporate Disclosure, financial intermediation, and market efficiency, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Volume 25, no 1 & 2, Jan-March, April, pp. 29-68
Jiang X., Lee B. (2005). An empirical test of the accounting-based residual income model and the traditional dividend discount model, Journal of Business 78 (4), pp. 1465-1504
Kim M., Ritter J. R. (1999). Valuing IPOs, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 53, pp. 409-437
Koller T., Goedhart M., Wessels D. (2005).Valuation: measuring and managing the value of companies, 4th edition, John Wiley & Sons
Kothari S., and Shanken J. (1995). Book-to-Market, Dividend Yield, and Expected Market Returns: A Time Series Analysis. University of Rochester
Lakonishok J., Schleifer A., and Vishny R. (1994). Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk, Journal of Finance, (December), pp. 1541-1578
Lee C., Measuring Wealth. (1996). CA Magazine 129 (3): 32-37
Lev, B., and Sougiannis, T. (1999). Penetrating the Book-to-Market Black Box: The R&D effect, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 26: (3&4)
Lie E., and Lie H. J. (2002). Multiples used to estimate corporate value, Financial Analyst Journal, vol. 58, issue 2, pp. 44 - 54
Lo K., Lys T. (2000). The Ohlson Model: Contribution to Valuation Theory, Limitations, and Empirical Applications. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 15: pp. 337-360
Luehrman, T.A. (1997). What’s it worth? A general manager’s guide to valuation, Harvard Business Review, 75(3), pp. 132-142
Marshall A. Principles of Economics. (1890). N.Y.
Michaud R. O., and Davis P. L. (1982). Valuation Model Bias and the Scale Structure of Dividend Discount Returns, The Journal of Finance, vol. 37, no. 2
Miller, M. and Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend Policy, Growth and the Valuation of Shares. The Journal of Business, October: pp. 411-433
Mills R. W., and Robertson J. (2004). Fundamentals of managerial accounting and finance, fourth edition, Mars Business Associates Ltd.
Morris E. L. (1994). Why Acquirers May Need to Rethink Terminal Values, Mergers and Acquisitions Journal, August, p. 24
Ohlson J. (2001). Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation: An empirical perspective, Contemporary Accounting Research, Volume 18 no 1: pp 107-120
Ohlson J. (1998). Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation: An empirical perspective, working paper, New York University, New York
Ohlson J. (1995). Earnings, Book Values and Dividends in Equity Valuation, Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2): pp 661-687
Penman S. H. (2010). Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation. McGraw-Hill
International Edition, 4th edition
Penman S. H. (2007). Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation, third edition,
McGrawHill, International Edition
Penman S. H. (1998). A Synthesis of Equity Valuation Techniques and the Terminal Value Calculation for the Dividend Discount Model, Review of Accounting Studies, 2, pp. 303-323
Piotroski, J.D. (2000). Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Journal of Accounting Research Vol 38, Supplement
Rees W. P. (1997). The Impact of Dividends, Debt and Investment on Valuation Models, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 24, pp. 1111-40
Richardson G., Tinaikar S. (2004). Accounting Based Valuation Models: What have we learned? Accounting and Finance 44: 223-255
Russell J. P. (2007). Valuation of Imaging Centers: Alternative Methods and Detailed Description of the Discounted Cash Flow Approach, Journal of the American College of Radiology, vol. 4 , pp. 53-64
Skogsvik K. (2002). A Tutorial on Residual Income Valuation and Value Added Valuation, SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration, no 1999:10
Torrez J., Rio P.C., Mohammad A., Ahmad H J. (2006). Corporate valuation: a literature review,
Inter Metro Business Journal Fall, Vol. 2 No. 2, p. 39
Volkov D.L. (2004a). The models of equity valuation: the problem of comparability. Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg State University. Management.(3): 3 - 36
Volkov D.L. (2004b). Value-based management and the problem of choosing an adequate model of estimation. Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg State University. Management. (4): 79-98
Xiaoquan J., and Bon-Soo L. (2005). An Empirical Test of the Accounting-Based Residual Income Model and the Traditional Dividend Discount Model, Journal of Business, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 1465-1504
Yoo Y. K. (2006). The valuation accuracy of equity valuation using a combination of multiples, Review of accounting and finance, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 108-123