Тип работы:
Предмет:
Язык работы:


Law and policy of combining carbon pricing and transition to renewable energy sources for the purposes of reducing greenhouse gas emissions on the example of Norway and the UK

Работа №49834

Тип работы

Дипломные работы, ВКР

Предмет

экология территорий

Объем работы46
Год сдачи2020
Стоимость4750 руб.
ПУБЛИКУЕТСЯ ВПЕРВЫЕ
Просмотрено
148
Не подходит работа?

Узнай цену на написание


Abstract_______________________________________________________________

Introduction____________________________________________________________

Chapter I. The key elements of climate change problem_________________________

Chapter II. The global concern of carbon pricing, renewable energy and reducing GHG emissions________________________________________________________________

Chapter III. Current position of Norway and the UK in climate change and energy policy_

Chapter IV. Legal regulation of carbon pricing, renewable energy and reduce of greenhouse gas emissions in Norway and the UK________________________________

Conclusion______________________________________________________________

Bibliography____________________________________________________________


Nowadays the topics related to the climate change problems are the top interest for all parts of the society. According to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), this means “a change of climate, which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability observed over comparable time periods” . The whole planet is faced to the possibility of continuation of global warming and the dramatic consequences caused by it.
There are many possible scenarios of which outcomes can appear because of the change of the climate. In addition, there is a clear relation between the climate change and the concern of the world society about this problem. The cost of climate change is very high, and people and governments realize that they have to deal with it in order to live in a better place in 50, 100 and more years after.
One of the key elements of the global climate change is the increased in recent centuries greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). Even if the greenhouse gases have existed since the birth of the Earth, it is not correct to argue that the global warming is a natural process. The problem is that the total amount of these gases has upgraded in recent centuries.
In this project, I want to put my attention on two methods of influencing the decreasing of negative effect of global climate change. As we can see, the modern society realize the danger of environmental issues, so many states try to manage with it not only in international level, but also through national policies.
Thereby, I want to cover the implementation of different types of carbon pricing policies and the transition to renewable energy sources in order to reduce the GHG emissions. I have chosen these ways of solving the climate change problems because they seem to be the most effective in compresence with other existing, but not excluding them. Moreover, they are widespread around states, and such policies we can see in Norway and the UK, which I have chosen for a kind of joint review in this paper.
Writing this project, I will not only focus on the example of Norway and the United Kingdom, but I will also examine the attitude towards the problem of climate change on the international and regional levels. I want to check actions made by the World Bank, which has activated during last years, attempts of the United Nations, which are designed in several international agreements, and the efforts made by the European Union (EU) and European Free Trade Association – European Economic Area (EFTA-EEA).
Additionally, I want to put there some points about the reason to choose Norway and the United Kingdom to compare with each other. Norway has a developed position in a field of using renewable energy sources and has a well-organised energy industry; in addition, it is one of leading producer in oil industry. Norway obtain a developed potential of innovations in a field of alternative energy sources, moreover, Norway was always about to invest in climate commitments and to facilitate developing countries to use their renewable energy resources and to put attention on climate change adaptation. Finally, the Government of a state has an approach to make Norway an environmentally friendly energy nation, which should encourage other nations and governments to make changes in their energy sectors and to develop renewable energy use.
As for the UK, which was during a long period of time one of the world’s first industrial-scale CO2 emitter, now it takes efforts to decrease the negative impact on the environment. In addition, the state has gaps to obtain a certain level of renewables in national energy sector up to 2050. The key element of the policy of the UK nowadays is the process of leaving the EU, which also affects every part of policy and legislation, especially energy and environmental.
After the analyses of the policies and legislations of these two states and the overlook at the international practices, I will be able to say whether it is effective or not to combine carbon pricing and transition to renewable energy sources for the purposes of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.



Возникли сложности?

Нужна помощь преподавателя?

Помощь в написании работ!


Pricing greenhouse gas emissions is obviously an essential part of environmental policy. Pricing emissions with taxes, emissions trading schemes or with a combination of these instruments encourages emitters to look for less expensive and more environmental-friendly ways of doing business. The reason why carbon pricing is so effective lays in the increase of the price of carbon-based energy, which encourages to seek and transit to greener energy sources, like a variety of renewable energy sources.
Here goes the strong liaison between these three parts of effective environmental policy and legislation: the introduction of carbon pricing let the transition to renewables more obvious. As a result, the amount of greenhouse gas emissions decreases, and the environmental situation goes to its best. The state can reach their national and international targets.
However, the effectiveness of such policies highly depends on every particular state. The effectiveness of carbon pricing is related to the rate of this price or the rate of the tax. The higher it is, the better it works. According to OECD, only few states provides an effective policy in carbon pricing area. It also depends on the level of corruption in the country, on the interest of society and government in environmental problems.
One of these states is Norway, which is the main character of current study. It provides both high rate of national carbon tax, it takes part in EU ETS, it uses mostly renewables in internal energy sector and puts ambitious goals in a field of GHG emissions reducing. The controversial thing is that this state on its own is the biggest fossil-fuels producer and exporter. Is it fair enough?
As for the United Kingdom, this state also makes sufficient steps towards effective carbon pricing policies and transition to renewables. It has attainable targets of reducing GHG emissions. However, the main issue for the whole state is the Brexit and how it would deal with it, which way it would choose. Having strong relations with the EU for a long decade, it could be hard to decide wisely.
Nevertheless, many studies and researches show us, that the combination of carbon pricing and transition to renewables works and the Planet has a chance to survive.



1. The Paris Agreement 2015
2. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC
3. Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings
4. Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control)
5. The Energy Act, No. 50 of 1990 (Norway)
6. CO2 Tax Act no 21 on Petroleum Activities (Norway)
7. Offshore Energy Act, No. 21 of 2010 (Norway)
8. Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Act (the UK)
9. Climate Change Act 2008 (the UK)
10. Energy Act 2016 (the UK)
11. The Carbon Plan: Delivering our low carbon future (2011) https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-carbon-plan-reducing-greenhouse-gas-emissions--2
12. The Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment (2016) Norway’s Climate Strategy for 2030 (white paper) https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/meld.-st.-41-20162017/id2557401/sec2?q=carbon%20neutrality#KAP2-2
13. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 1988
List of literature
1. Aasen M. (2017) The polarization of public concern about climate change in Norway. Climate Policy, Vol. 17 (2), p. 213-230
2. Allan, G., Hanley, N., McGregor, P., Swales, K., Turner, K., (2007) The impact of increased efficiency in the industrial use of energy: A computable general equilibrium analysis for the United Kingdom. Energy Economics, Modeling of Industrial Energy Consumption 29, 779–798
3. Ambec S, Cohen MA, Elgie S, Lanoie P. The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Rev Environ Econ Policy 2013, 7:2–22
4. Araujo K. (2017) Low Carbon Energy Transitions: Turning Points in National Policy and Innovation; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK
5. Aurora Energy Research, (2016) Brexit – implications for UK energy. Aurora Energy Research, Oxford
6. Babiker MH. Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage. J Int Econ 2005, 65:421–445
7. Bassi S., Duffy C. (216) UK climate change policy: how does it affect competitiveness? The Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment
8. Bassi S., Fankhauser S., Green F., Nachmany M. (2014) Walking alone? How the UK’s carbon targets compare with its competitors Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment
9. BEIS, (2016) Energy consumption in the UK (2016). Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, London
10. Beisland C. (2013), “From targets to timetables to technology investments”, CREE working paper 12/2013, Frisch Center, University of Oslo
11. Bergsli, Camilla. “The Future of CCS in Norway”. Cornerstone, 2017. Web. 20 Feb. 2017.
12. Blindheim B. (2015) A missing link? The case of Norway and Sweden: Does increased renewable energy production impact domestic greenhouse gas emissions? Energy Policy, Elsevier, February 2015
13. Bond, I., Besch, S., Gostynska-Jakubowska, A., Korteweg, R., Mortera-Martinez, C., Tilford, S., (2016) Europe after Brexit: Unleashed or undone? Centre for European Reform, London
14. Brendemoen, A. and H. Vennemo (1994): A Climate Treaty and the Norwegian Economy: A CGE Assessment, Energy Journal 15(1), 77-93
15. Bruvoll, A., Larsen B. M., (2002) “Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Norway: Do Carbon Taxes Work?” Statistics Norway, Research Department
16. Burns C. et al., (2016) ‘The EU Referendum and the UK Environment: An Expert Review’
17. Burns C., Jordan A., Gravey V., (2016) ‘The EU Referendum and the UK Environment: the Future Under a ‘Hard’ and a ‘Soft’ Brexit”
18. Burns C. et al., (2019) De-Europeanising or disengaging? EU environmental policy and Brexit
19. Bye, B. og K. Nyborg (1999): The Welfare Effects of Carbon Policies: Grandfathered Quotas versus Differentiated Taxes, Discussion Papers 261, Statistics Norway
20. Bye, T. and Hope, E. (2005). Deregulation of Electricity Markets: The Norwegian Experience, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 40, No. 50, pp. 5269-5278
21. Central Intelligence Agency (2016) “The World Factbook: Norway.” Central Intelligence Agency
22. Chan NW, Gillingham K. The microeconomic theory of the rebound effect and its welfare implications. J Assoc Environ Resour Econ 2015, 2:133–159
23. Clayton B. D., (2013) Getting to Grips with Green Plans: National-level Experience in Industrial Countries. Ebook ed., Routledge
24. Climate Action Tracker “Climate Action Tracker: Norway.” Climate Action Tracker, 2016
25. Cox E., Royston S., Selby J. The impacts of non-energy policies on the energy system: a scoping paper. The UK Energy Research Centre (UKERC)
26. Dechezleprêtre A., Martin R., Bassi S. (2016) Climate change policy, innovation and growth The Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment
27. DEFRA, (2016) UK’s carbon footprint 1997-2013. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London
28. Eckersley R., (2015) “National Identities, International Roles, and the Legitimation of Climate Leadership: Germany and Norway Compared.“ Environmental Politics, vol. 25, no.1, 2015
29. Ehhalt D., Prather M. (2018) Atmospheric Chemistry and Greenhouse Gases. P 241.
30. Ekins, P., Dutton, J., Watson, J., (2016) The EU referendum: Implications for UK Energy Policy (UKERC policy briefing). UKERC, London
31. Environmental Defense Fund and International Emissions Trading Association. “The World’s Carbon Markets: A Case Study Guide to Emissions Trading.” Environmental Defense Fund, May 2013
32. Erdogdu, E. (2013). Essays on Electricity Market Reforms: A Cross-Country Applied Approach, PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, UK
33. Erdogdu, E. (2013). Implications of Liberalization Policies on Government Support to R&D: Lessons for Electricity Markets, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vo. 17, January, pp. 110-118
34. Erdogdu, E. (2014). Investment, Security of Supply and Sustainability in the aftermath of Three Decades of Power Sector Reform, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 31, March, pp. 1-8
35. Ekins, P. and S. Speck (1999): Competitiveness and exemptions from environmental taxes in Europe, Environmental and Resource Economics 13, 369-396
36. Environmental Audit Committee (EAC), Third Report of Session 2015–16, ‘EU and UK Environmental Policy’
37. European Court of Auditors. Special Report. The integrity and implementation of the EU ETS (2015). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015
38. European Environment Agency. “An Overview of EU Environment Policy Targets and Objectives.” European Environment Agency, 2017
39. “Everything you need to know about the Norwegian energy sector”, Energy fact Norway
40. Fairley P. (2009) “Carbon Trading on the Cheap.” MIT Technology Review, 23 June. 2009
41. Gavenas, E., Rosendahl K. E., Skjerpen T., (2015) “CO2- emissions from Norwegian Oil and Gas Extraction.” Statistics Norway Research Department
42. Greaker M., Golombek R., Hoel M., (2018) Global impact of national climate policy in the Nordic countries
43. Greaker M., Hagem C., (2013), Strategic Investment in climate friendly technologies: The impact of permit trade, Environmental and Resource Economics 591, p. 65-85
44. Gullberg A. T., (2014) "Towards a low carbon energy future - Renewable energy cooperation," Renewable Energy, vol. 68, pp. 216-222
45. Hamlehdari M., Aslani A. (2017) Analysis of energy system in Norway with focus on energy consumption prediction. Management of Sustainable Development Sibiu, Romania, Volume 9, No.1
46. Helm D., (2010) The Case for Carbon Taxes, in Less, S (ed) Greener, Cheaper, Policy Exchange, London
47. Hilson, C. (2018) The impact of Brexit on the environment: exploring the dynamics of a complex relationship. Transnational Environmental Law, 7 (1). pp. 89­113
48. Hirst D., (2018) Carbon Price Floor (CPF) and the price support mechanism. House of Commons, Briefing Paper
49. HM Treasury, Budget 2011, HC 836, March 2011, para 1.111
50. Howes M, et al. (2017) Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure? Sustainability 2017, 9, 165
51. Institute for European Environmental Policy (2016), ‘Brexit: The Implications for UK Environmental Policy and Regulation’
52. International Emissions Trading Association. “Norway: An Emissions Trading Case Study.” International Emissions Trading Association, May 2015
53. International Energy Agency. “Policy and Measures: CO2 Tax Norway”. International Energy Agency, 2013
54. Investigations into the causal effect of carbon pricing policies, such as the European Emissions Trading System and carbon taxes in Scandinavia, show that carbon pricing is indeed a significant driver of emissions reductions.[ref]Petrick, S., Wagner, U. J. (2014). The impact of carbon trading on industry: Evidence from German manufacturing firms, Kiel Working Paper, No. 1912, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW), Kiel
55. IPCC (2007). Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
56. Jevnaker T., Lunde L., Skjærseth J. B. EU-Norway Energy Relations towards 2050: From Fossil Fuels to Low-Carbon Opportunities? Decarbonization in the European Union, pp 222-243
57. Klenert, D., Mattauch, L., Combet, E., Edenhofer, O., Hepburn, C., Rafaty, R., Stern, N. (2018). Making Carbon Pricing Work for Citizens. Nature Climate Change 8, 669–677
58. Laing, T. et al., (2014) “The Effects and Side-Effects of the EU Emissions Trading Schemes.” Wiley Online Library
59. Lallanilla M. (2019) Greenhouse Gasses: Causes, Sources and Environmental Effects
60. Larsen, B.M. and R. Nesbakken (1997): “Norwegian Emissions of CO2 1987-1994. A study of some effects of the CO2 tax”, Environmental and Resource Economics 9(3), 275-290
61. Lazkano I., Nøstbakken L., Pelli M., (2017), «From fossil fuels to renewables: The role of electricity storage», European Economic Review 99, p. 113-129
62. Norwegian Ministry of the Environment, Report “Norway`s Fifth National Communication under the Framework Convention on Climate Change” (Status report as of December 2009)
63. Periono G. (2018), “New EU ETS Phase 4 rules temporarily puncture waterbed”, Nature Climate Change 8, p. 262-264
64. Regjeringen (Government) Norway. “Environment and Climate Change.” Regjeringen Norway, 2015
65. Renewables Consulting Group, (2016) Brexit –renewables unplugged. Implications of the decision to leave the EU for offshore renewables industries. Renewables Consulting Group, Romsey
66. Rosendahl, K.E. (2004), “Cost-effective environmental policy: Implications of induced technological change”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48, p. 1099-1121
67. Skjærseth J. B., (2004) International Regimes and Norway’s Environmental Policy: Crossfire and Coherence. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate
68. Statistics Norway. “Emissions of Greenhouse Gases, 1990-2015, Final Figures.” Statistics Norway, 2015
69. Statoil report (2017) Minimizing greenhouse gas emissions. Greenhouse gas emissions of the Norwegian natural gas value chain 2016
70. Stocks B., (2017) Environmental Policy in Scandinavia. An Analysis of Norway’s Rising CO2 Emissions. A Senior Honors Thesis Submitted to the Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego
71. The Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment (2018) What is a carbon price and why do we need one? Accessed online http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/faqs/what-is-a-carbon-price-and-why-do-we-need-one/
72. Tomlinson S. (2018) Brexit and climate cooperation. Implications for the Paris Agreement and net-zero E3G
73. Urban F., Nordensvärd J. (2018) Low Carbon Energy Transitions in the Nordic Countries: Evidence from the Environmental Kuznets Curve; Energies 2018, 11, 2209
74. Ytterhus E. B., Environmental Policy Tools and Firm-level Management Practices in Norway. Norwegian School of Management (BI) in cooperation with OECD Environment Directorate
75. Watson Farley and Williams, (2016) Impact of Brexit on UK energy sector. Watson Farley and Williams, London
76. Winskel, M 2016, From optimisation to diversity: Changing scenarios of UK buildings heating. in D Hawkey, J Webb, H Lovell, D McCrone, M Tingey & M Winskel, Sustainable Urban Energy Policy. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 68-90
77. Wu H., (2015) Business model innovation within the Norwegian energy sector. A comparative case study of business model innovation applied by ABB and DNVGL to adapt to the energy change in Norway. Centre for Entrepreneurship. The Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences. Universitet i Oslo



Работу высылаем на протяжении 30 минут после оплаты.




©2025 Cервис помощи студентам в выполнении работ