Тип работы:
Предмет:
Язык работы:


TUMOR CELLS DETECTION USING MACHINE LEARNING FROM IMAGES OF ADENOCARCENOMA TISSUES

Работа №186998

Тип работы

Бакалаврская работа

Предмет

биология

Объем работы59
Год сдачи2025
Стоимость4500 руб.
ПУБЛИКУЕТСЯ ВПЕРВЫЕ
Просмотрено
15
Не подходит работа?

Узнай цену на написание


ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION 3
1. CLINICAL ASPECT 4
1.1 Colorectal adenocarcinoma 4
1.2 Universal tools for medical imaging 6
1.3 Convolutional neural networks in medical imaging 8
1.4 Predicting gene expression from histoscans 12
1.5 Difficulties in analyzing whole-slide images 15
2. FEATURE EXTRACTION USING UNSUPERVISED LEARNING 19
2.1 Unsupervised Machine Learning: Python implementation 19
2.2 ResNet50 Architecture 24
2.3 Processing whole-slide images 27
RESULTS 32
CONCLUSION 35
REFERENCES 36

Despite the progress of molecular oncology, histological analysis remains a key tool for verifying the diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinomas (CRA). However, traditional microscopy faces fundamental limitations: high subjectivity of interpretation, labor-intensive processing of whole-slide images (WSI), and difficulty in quantifying heterogeneous tissue patterns. Digital pathology, combined with deep learning techniques, offers new ways to solve these problems by automating and standardizing analysis. Of particular interest is the use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which can detect subtle correlations between histological architectonics and molecular profiles of tumors. The ResNet50 architecture demonstrates unique advantages for WSI processing thanks to a residual block mechanism that prevents feature degradation in deep layers of the network.
Aim
To develop and validate a ResNet50 approach for uncontrolled detection of cancer cells and gene expression on colorectal adenocarcinoma histoscans.
Research objectives
1. Optimize the processing of whole-slide images using an adapted tile splitting strategy that minimizes context losses.
2. Implement clustering of histological structures using contrastive learning methods (SwAV).
3. To assess the correlation of the identified morphological clusters with the expression of key genes (KRAS, TP53, APC).
4. Analyze the computational efficiency of the method and the clinical interpretability of the results.

Возникли сложности?

Нужна помощь преподавателя?

Помощь в написании работ!


The study achieved its goal, confirming the effectiveness of the adapted ResNet50 architecture for uncontrolled analysis of histological sections of colorectal adenocarcinoma. The solution of research tasks is implemented as follows:
Optimization of WSI processing is provided by a patch-oriented strategy with a tile size of 512x512 pixels and an overlap of 6.25%, which preserves contextual information at the boundaries of areas. Integration of the MobileNetV3- based CNN filter made it possible to exclude 70.6% of irrelevant fragments (artifacts, background), reducing the amount of data processed while maintaining diagnostically significant structures.
Clustering of tissue patterns was successfully implemented by the SwAV algorithm, which identified four clinically significant clusters: stroma, adenocarcinoma glands, lymphoid infiltrates, and areas associated with KRAS/TP53 expression. Validation using the Adjusted Rand Index (0.931) metric confirmed that the clusters conform to the expert markup.
Computational efficiency is achieved through parallel processing on the GPU and quantization of model weights (float16), which reduces the analysis time of 1.4 million tiles to 6.3 computational hours — 7.6 times faster than the sequential approach. Clinical interpretability is provided by visualization of t-SNE, which linksen latent representations of the network in the feature space with biologically significant structures.
Future research prospects include overcoming the domain shift through federated learning, developing interpreted architectures for clinical implementation, and creating end-to-end pipelines for multimodal integration of histological, genomic, and clinical data.


1. Fearon E.R., Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis // Cell. 1990. Vol. 61. P 759-767.
2. Grady W.M. et al. Molecular alterations in colorectal cancer // Gastroenterology. 2019. Vol. 157. P 277-290.
3. Siegel R.L. et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023 // CA Cancer J Clin. 2023. Vol. 73. P. 233-254.
4. Ahn S.B. et al. The evolution of adenomas and their association with metachronous colorectal cancer // Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022. Vol. 20. P e1483-e1495.
5. Cohen J.D. et al. Detection and localization of surgically resectable cancers with a multi-analyte blood test // Science. 2018. Vol. 359. P 926-930.
6. Brenner H. et al. Colorectal cancer // Lancet. 2014. Vol. 383. P 1490­1502.
7. Loberg M. et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal // N Engl J Med. 2014. Vol. 371. P 799-807.
8. Wang W. et al. Mitochondrial protein Mfn2: a key regulator in colorectal cancer progression // Cancer Lett. 2020. Vol. 491. P 54-61.
9. Kalluri R. The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer // Nat Rev Cancer. 2016. Vol. 16. P 582-598.
10. Galon J. et al. Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome // Science. 2006. Vol. 313. P 1960-1964.
11. Grady W.M. et al. Multimodal AI in medicine: principles and applications // Journal of Digital Medicine. 2024. Vol. 12. P 45-62.
12. Ronneberger O. et al. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation // Nature Methods. 2023. Vol. 20. P 112-125.
13. Vasiliev Y.A. et al. Automated analysis of CT lungs in pneumonias // Radiology Practice. 2023. Vol. 18. № 4. P 88-97.
14. Guinney J. et al. The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer // Nature Medicine. 2025. Vol. 31. P 1350-1356.
15. Li H. Dynamic alignment of time series in medical data // Journal of AI in Healthcare. 2024. Vol. 9. P 77-89.
... всего 60 источников


Работу высылаем на протяжении 30 минут после оплаты.




©2025 Cервис помощи студентам в выполнении работ