INTRODUCTION 4
CHAPTER 1. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND OF REMOTE WORK AND
ENGAGEMENT 7
1.1. The phenomenon of remote work and its characteristics 7
Flexibility in the workplace 7
Remote work: definition, background, and classifications 9
Remote working experience: effectiveness, organizational trust, work-related flexibility, work-life interference 13
Knowledge employees and remote work 16
Remote work and engagement 17
1.2. The phenomenon of engagement and its characteristics 19
CHAPTER 2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ON REMOTE WORK AND
ENGAGEMENT 27
2.1. Analysis of remote work labor market in Russia 27
2.2. Research methodology 29
Procedures 29
Sample and context description 30
CHAPTER 3. RESULTS OF THE EMPIRICAL STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF
REMOTE WORKING EXPERIENCE ON WORK ENGAGEMENT 38
CONCLUSION 52
References 54
Appendix 64
Questionnaire 64
Remote working experience 64
Work engagement 72
In the past few years there has been growing interest from employers in flexible working. During the COVID-19 pandemic this tendency has been especially accelerated with the growing introduction of flexible working practices (FWP), which denote a degree of choice over when, where and how much to work (Anderson and Kelliher, 2009). For many employers, the implementation of flexible work is aimed to improve their attractiveness in the labor market and to help them recruit and retain high quality staff (Croucher and Kelliher, 2005).
Remote work is probably the most indicative phenomenon when it comes to the workplace flexibility. It is related to work performed away from traditional office spaces and flexible working hours using digital technologies (Soga et al., 2022). According to Pattnaik and Jena (2021), remote work results in increased employee productivity and saving on commuting, time, and carbon miles. However, there are some concerns that remote work could bring about tensions with work-life balance (Como et al., 2020) and stress factors such as work intensification, online presenteeism, employment insecurity and poor adaptation to new ways of working from home. These further lead to the depletion of social and personal resources, adversely affecting employee engagement levels (Adisa et al., 2021).
Currently, a growing number of research is dedicated to the relationship between remote work and employee engagement. Truss et al. (2006) coin engagement as “feeling positive about your job”. However, this phenomenon goes beyond positive disposition towards job, passion, and enthusiasm, but involves willingness to improve the overall quality of work contributing to organizational success (Schaufeli and Bakker, 2010). Since employee engagement impacts commitment, loyalty, retention (Jamrog, J., 2004; Saks, 2006), and most importantly - business outcomes (Council, 2004), it is extremely important to keep track of it.
As many studies have proven the interdependence of remote work and engagement, it is relevant to explore the nature of it in a specific context. Golden and Gajendran (2019) state that knowledge employees, who mostly perform their work on laptop, tend to be more satisfied with the remote working option because their work is highly complicated and require more concentration rather than social collaboration. Knowledge workers, in turn, constitute a vital organizational resource for professional services firms (PSF). According to Empson. L. (2001) , PSF are the role models in knowledge management because a firm’s ability to deliver value to clients depends on the skills of its professionals (Nanda and Narayandas, 2021). However, when it comes to remote work, a range of concerns regarding maintenance of high motivation and engagement levels arise for employers.
This study aims to assess theoretically relevant aspects of remote working experience that most probably have an effect on the work engagement of knowledge employees. As the introduction of remote work continue to change the workplaces, this most likely will be mirrored in job effectiveness, relationship with the organization, work-related flexibility, and work-life balance (Baruch, 2000; Kowalski and Swanson, 2005; Leung and Zhang, 2017). The research on these four categories would allow organizations to identify their key areas of improvement and develop relevant strategies to support effective remote working environment, positively impacting engagement levels.
The empirical research is aimed to identify the effects of remote working experience on work engagement of knowledge employees in Russian PSF. To achieve the goal, the extant literature in remote work and engagement was analyzed. Since remote work is a sophisticated phenomenon, it was defined through four relevant perspectives involving organizational trust, effectiveness, flexibility and work-life interference. Engagement, in turn, is also comprised of three factors of vigor, dedication, and absorption. As a result, the hypothesis “Work engagement is positively affected by remote working experience ” was deducted. Then it was specified by three additional hypotheses:
• Vigor is positively affected by remote working experience;
• Dedication is positively affected by remote working experience;
• Absorption is positively affected by remote working experience.
To test the hypotheses, the quantitative research with a questionnaire distributed to 166 employees of B1 Group was carried out. The questionnaire results revealed that with remote work the level of organizational trust and effectiveness is pretty high within the organization. However, the social life is extremely poor when employees work remotely.
The linear regression models confirmed the above stated hypotheses since organizational trust and effectiveness have strong positive impact on work engagement of remote workers. Additionally, higher position and employment in a department other than assurance results in increased engagement factors.
As for the comments of remote workers in the questionnaire, they are associated mainly with five aspects of remote workplace, IT facilities, work-life balance, interaction with co-workers, and time management.
Having analyzed the data from three above listed sources, the recommendations regarding improvement of remote working experience to increase work engagement levels were developed by the author. Firstly, as it stems from the common understanding of remote work, IT facilities are inevitable. Hence, embedding advanced IT infrastructure for effective remote work is of paramount importance. Next, there is a suggestion to extend soft skills training in the remote setup followed by the maintenance of positive emotional state and well-being of employees via sessions dedicated to the tips on managing work-related thoughts and stress. As for the employees not working in the managerial position, and for those working in assurance department more contextual information is required to develop a specific action plan. Currently, it is important to track their level of satisfaction, attitudes via constant trustful dialogue.
Thus, all the actions are considered to boost the level of trust between an employee and employer and effectiveness, which, as it was revealed by the regression analysis, affect the level of work engagement. After the utilization of provided recommendations, it is expected that the level of employees’ motivation, loyalty, and retention will benefit.
1. About bl group. (n.d.). En. b1.Ru. Retrieved May 2, 2023, from https://en.b1.ru/
2. Academy of Business B1. (2023). Soft Skills - тренинги развития межличностных навыков, курсы
по развитию hard and soft skills. Retrieved May 26, 2023, from
https://academyb1.ru/catalog/treningi razvitiya mezhlichnostnykh navykov soft skills/
3. Adisa, T., Ogbonnaya, C. and Adekoya, O. (2021), "Remote working and employee engagement: a qualitative study of British workers during the pandemic", Information Technology & People, Vol. ahead- of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-12-2020-0850
4. Aitken-Fox, E., Coffey, J., Dayaram, K., Fitzgerald, S., Gupta, C., McKenna, S. and Wei Tian, A. (2020). “Covid-19 has put trust front and center in human resources management”. LSE Business Review. Blog Entry.
5. Albert, S. and Bradley, K. (1997). Managing Knowledge: Experts, Agencies and Organizations. Cambridge University Press.
6. Alexander, A., De Smet, A., Langstaff, M., & Ravid, D. (2021). “What employees are saying about the
future of remote work”. McKinsey. Www.mckinsey.com. Retrieved March 2, 2023 from
https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance
7. Almer, E. and Kaplan, S. (2002). “The Effects of Flexible Work Arrangements on Stressors, Burnout, and Behavioral Job Outcomes in Public Accounting”. Behavioral Research in Accounting. Vol. 14. doi: 10.2308/bria.2002.14.1.1
8. Anderson, D. and Kelliher, C. (2009), “Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work”, Human Relations, Vol. 63. doi: 10.1177/0018726709349199
9. Anderson, D. and Kelliher, C. (2009), “Flexible working and engagement: the importance of choice”, Strategic HR Review, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/14754390910937530
10. Andrea, A., Aaron, D. and Mihir, M., (2020). “How companies can make remote working a success”.
McKinsey. Www.mckinsey.com. Retrieved March 2, 2023 from
https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance
11. Armstrong, M., and Taylor, S. (2014). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice. 13th ed., p. 139. Kogan Page, London Armstrong.
12. Bains, S. (1999). “Servicing the media: freelancing, teleworking, and ‘enterprising’ careers”. New Technology, Work and Employment, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 18-31.
13. Bakarich et al., 2021. “Has the fever left a burn? A study of the impact of COVID-19 remote working arrangements on public accountants’ burnout”. Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 35 No. 6, pp. 792-814. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-09-2021-0249
14. Bal, P., De Lange, A. (2014). “From flexibility human resource management to employee engagement and perceived job performance across the lifespan: A multisample study”. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. Vol. 88. doi: 10.1111/joop.12082
15. Barber, K. and Santuzzi, A. (2015), “Please respond ASAP: workplace telepressure and employee recovery”, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 172-189, doi: 10.1037/ a0038278.
16. Barcus, S., and Wilkinson, J. (1995). Handbook of Management Consulting Services. pp. 219 - 238.
17. Bareket-Bojmel, L., Shahar, G., Abu-Kaf, S., Margalit, M. (2021). “Perceived social support, loneliness, and hope during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Testing a mediating model in the UK, USA, and Israel”. Br J Clin Psychol. Vol. 60 No. 2. pp. 133-148. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12285.
18. Barney, J. (1991). “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”. Journal of Management, Vol. 17, pp. 99-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
19. Barsness, Z., Diekmann, K., and Seidel, M. (2005). “Motivation and opportunity: The role of remote work, demographic dissimilarity, and social network centrality in impression management”. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 48, No. 3, 401-419. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407906
20. Baruch, Y. (2000), “Teleworking: benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers”, New Technology Work and Employment, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 34-49.
21. Baruch, Y. (2001). “The status of research on teleworking and an agenda for future research”. International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 113-129.
22. Baruch, Y. and Nicholson, N. (1997). “Home, sweet work: requirements for effective homeworking”. Journal of General Management, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 15-30.
23. Beigi, M., Shirmohammadi, M., and Stewart, J. (2018). “Flexible work arrangements and work-family conflict: A metasynthesis of qualitative studies among academics”. Human Resource Development Review, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 314-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484318787628
24. Berger, P., and Luckmann, T. (1967). “The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge”. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
25. Bhatnagar, J. (2012). Management of innovation: Role of psychological empowerment, work engagement and turnover intention in the Indian context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 928-951. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.651313
26. Bothma, F., and Roodt, G. (2012). “Work-based identity and work engagement as potential antecedents of task performance and turnover intention: Unravelling a complex relationship”. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v38i1.893
27. Brown, J. and Duguid, P. (1991). “Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation”. Organization science. Vol. 2. pp. 40 - 57.
28. Butler, H. (2021). “The History of Remote Work: How It Became What We Know Today”. Retrieved March 15, 2023, from https://www.crossover.com/perspective/the-history-of-remote-work
29. Caudron, S. (1992). “Working at home pays off’. Personnel Journal. pp. 40-49.
30. Cesario, F. and Chambel, M. (2017). “Linking organizational commitment and work engagement to employee performance”. Knowledge and Process Management. Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1542
31. Chen, Y., Fulmer, I. (2017). “Fine-tuning what we know about employees’ experience with flexible work arrangements and their job attitudes”. Human Resource Management, Vol. 57 No. 1, pp. 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21849
32. Christian, M., Garza, A. and Slaughter, J. (2011). “Work engagement: a quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance”. Personnel Psychology. Vol. 64 No. 1, pp. 89-136.
33. Chughtai, A., Byrne, M. and Flood, B. (2015). “Linking ethical leadership to employee well-being: The role of trust in supervisor. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 128 No. 3, pp. 653-663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2126-7
34. Collins, A., Hislop, D. and Cartwright, S. (2016), “Social support in the workplace between teleworkers, office-based colleagues and supervisors”, New Technology, Work and Employment, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 161-175.
35. Como, R., Hambley, L., and Domene, J. (2020). “An Exploration of Work-Life Wellness and Remote Work During and Beyond COVID-19”. Canadian Journal of Career Development, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 46¬56.
36. Cooper, C. and Dewe, P. (2008). “Well-being-absenteeism, presenteeism, costs and challenges”. Occupational Medicine, Vol. 58 No. 8, pp. 522-524. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqn124
37. Cooper, C. and Kurland, N. (2002), “Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 511-532.
38. Cooper, R. and Baird, M. (2015). “Bringing the “right to request” flexible working arrangements to
life: From policies to practices”. Employee Relations, Vol. 37 No. 5, pp. 568-581.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-07-2014-0085
39. Council, C. (2004). “Driving performance and retention through employee engagement”. Washington, DC: Corporate Executive Board, p. 32.
40. Croucher, R. and Kelliher, C. (2005), ‘‘The right to request flexible working in Britain: the law and organizational realities’’, European Journal of Comparative Law and Industrial Relations, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 503-529
41. Derks, D. and Bakker, A. (2014), “Smartphone use, work-home interference, and burnout: a diary study on the role of recovery”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 63 No. 3, pp. 411 -440, doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00530.x.
42. Derks, D., van Mierlo, H. and Schmitz, E. (2014), “A diary study on work-related smartphone use, psychological detachment and exhaustion: examining the role of the perceived segmentation norm”, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 74-84, doi: 10.1037/a0035076
43. Di Martino, V. and Wirth, L. (1990). “Telework: a new way of working and living”. International Labour Review, Vol. 129 No. 5, pp. 520-554.
44. Donnelly, R. (2006). “How “free” is the free worker? An investigation into the working arrangements available to knowledge workers”. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480610636803
45. Drucker, P. (1959). The Landmarks of tomorrow. Harper, New York.
46. Drucker, P. (1969). The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society. New York: Harper and Row.
47. Drucker, P. (1999). Management Challenges for the 21st Century. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
48. Eldor, L. and Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2017), “The nature of employee engagement: rethinking the employee-organization relationship”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 526-552.
49. Empson, L. (2001). “Introduction: Knowledge Management in Professional Service Firms”. Human Relations, Vol. 54, pp. 811-817.
50. EY (n.d.). Work in Russia. Www.ey.com. Retrieved May 24, 2023, from
https://www.ey.com/en gl/news/2022/02/ey-statement-on-ukraine
51. EY.RU (2020). Обзор мер, предпринимаемых работодателями в связи с COVID-19.
ey covid 19 countermeasures survey.pdf - Яндекс.Документы (yandex.ru)
52. Forbes (n.d.). EY Company Overview & News. Retrieved May 24, 2023, from
https: //www .forbes. com/companies/ey/? sh=436df0f2d49d
53. Gallup Inc. (2021). Gallup’s Q12 Employee Engagement Survey - Gallup. Gallup.com. Retrieved April 12, 2023, from https://www.gallup.com/workplace/356063/gallup-q12-employee-engagement-survey.aspx
54. Gallup, (2013). State of the American Workplace Report: Employee Engagement Insights for U.S. Business Leaders. Washington, D.C.: Gallup, Inc.
55. Golden, T. and Gajendran, R. (2019). “Unpacking the Role of a Telecommuter’s Job in Their Performance: Examining Job Complexity, Problem Solving, Interdependence, and Social Support”. Journal of Business and Psychology. Vol. 34 No. 2. pp. 1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10869-018-9530-4
56. Golden, T. and Raghuram, S. (2010), “Teleworker knowledge sharing and the role of altered relational and technological interactions”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 31 No. 8, pp. 1061-1085, doi: 10.1002/job.652
57. Goodrich, J. (1990). “Telecommuting in America”. Business Horizons, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 31-37.
58. Gottlieb, B., Kelloway, E. and Barham, E. (1998). Flexible Work Arrangements. Chichester: Wiley.
59. Grant, C., Wallace, L. and Spurgeon, P. (2013). “An exploration of the psychological factors affecting remote e-worker’s job effectiveness, well-being and work-life balance”, Employee Relations, Vol. 5 No.
35, pp. 527-546, doi: 10.1108/ER-08-2012-0059.
60. Grant, C., Wallace, L., Spurgeon, P., Tramontano, C. and Charalampous, M. (2019), "Construction and initial validation of the E-Work Life Scale to measure remote e-working", Employee Relations, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 16-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-09-2017-0229
61. Grant, R. (1996). “Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm.” Winter 1996. Vol. 17. Pp. 109 - 122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
62. Groen, B., van Triest, S., Coers, M. and Wtenweerde, N. (2018). “Managing flexible work arrangements: Teleworking and output controls”. European Management Journal, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 727¬735. https:ZZdoi.org/10.1016Zj.emj.2018.01.007
63. Gupta, Y., Karimi, J. and Somers, T. (2000). “A study on the usage of computer and communication technologies for telecommuting”. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 26-39.
64. Handy, S. and Mokhtarian, P. (1996). “The future of telecommuting.”. Futures, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 227 -240.
65. Hansen, M., Nohria, N., and Tierney, T. (2014). “What’s Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge? Harvard Business Review”. Retrieved April 9, 2023, from https://hbr.org/1999/03/whats- your-strategy-for-managing-knowledge
66. Harter, J., Schmidt, F. and Hayes, T. (2002), “Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis”. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87 No. 2, pp. 268-279.
67. Hartig, T., Kylin, C. and Johansson, G. (2007), “The telework tradeoff: stress mitigation vs constrained restoration”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 56 No. 2, pp. 231-253, doi: 10.1111/ j.1464-0597.2006.00252.x.
68. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (2016). “Digitization of industrial work: Development paths and prospects”. Journal for Labor Market Research, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12651-016-0200-6
69. Huws, U. (1993). Teleworking in Britain. Employment Department Research Series 18. London: HMSO.
70. Jamrog, J. (2004). “The perfect storm: The future of retention and engagement”. People and Strategy, Vol. 27 No. 3, p. 26.