Тема: Механизм разрешения споров в рамках Всемирной торговой организации

1. Agreement on Agriculture, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1A, 1867 U.N.T.S. 410. // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
2. Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1A, 1869 U.N.T.S. 14 // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
3. Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, Article 4 // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
4. Council Regulation (EC) No 3286/94 of 22 December 1994 laying down Community procedures in the field of the common commercial policy in order to ensure the exercise of the Community's rights under international trade rules, in particular those established under the auspices of the World Trade Organization // URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/;
5. Dispute Settlement Rules: Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 2, 1869 U.N.T.S. 401, 33 I.L.M. 1226 (1994) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
6. GATS: General Agreement on Trade in Services, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1B, 1869 U.N.T.S. 183, 33 I.L.M. 1167 (1994) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
7. GATT 1994: General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1A, 1867 U.N.T.S. 187, 33 I.L.M. 1153 (1994) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
8. International Law Commission, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, November 2001, Supplement No. 10 (A/ 56/10), chp.IV.E.1 // URL: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ddb8f804.html;
9. Investigation Rules of Foreign Trade Barriers, entered into force on 1 March 2005 // URL: http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/;
10. Section 301(a)(1) of the Trade Act 1974, 19 USC 2411(a)(1) // URL: https://legacy.trade.gov;
11. The WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement) (1995) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
12. TRIPS: Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, 1869 U.N.T.S. 299, 33 I.L.M. 1197 (1994) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
13. Working Procedures for Appellate Review, WT/AB/WP/6, dated 16 August 2010 // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
14. WTO Agreement: Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Apr. 15, 1994, 1867 U.N.T.S. 154, 33 I.L.M. 1144 (1994) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
15. Федеральный закон РФ от 21 июля 2012 года № 126-ФЗ о ратификации Протокола «О присоединении Российской Федерации к Марракешскому соглашению об учреждении Всемирной торговой организации от 15 апреля 1994 г.» от 16.12.2011 [Электронный ресурс] // Справочная правовая система «КонсультантПлюс» - Режим доступа: http://www.consultant.ru.
ССпециальная литература
16. Бублик В.А., Губарева А.В. Конфликт юрисдикций в глобальной и региональных системах разрешения споров /В.А. Бублик // Электронное приложение к Российскому юридическому журналу. - 2018. - №5. - С. 113;
17. Всемирная торговая организация [Текст] : экономика, политика, право : монография / И. И. Дюмулен ; Всероссийская акад. внешней торговли. - 2-е изд., доп. - Москва : ВАВТ, 2012. - 357 с;
18. Зайцева Л. И. Механизм разрешения споров в рамках ВТО: стадии, предшествующие передаче спора третейским группам / Л. И. Зайцева // Вестник ИрГТУ. - 2015. - №6 (101). - С. 199;
19. Зайцева, Л.И. Права государств в процессе разрешения споров во всемирной торговой организации: дис. канд. юрид. наук: 12.00.10 [Электронный ресурс] // Российская государственная библиотека - Режим доступа: https://www.rsl.ru;
20. Лемяскина Н.Е. Апелляционный орган ВТО: теоретические и практические вопросы / Н.Е. Лемяскина // Актуальные проблемы российского права. - 2014. - №12. - С. 2913;
21. Международное право: Учебник (5-е издание, переработанное и дополненное) (отв. ред. С.А. Егоров). - М.: Статут, 2014. - С. 450;
22. Международное право: учебник / Б.М. Ашавский, М.М. Бирюков, В.Д. Бордунов и др.; отв. ред. С.А. Егоров. 5-е изд., перераб. и доп. М.: Статут, 2014 [Электронный ресурс] // Справочная правовая система «КонсультантПлюс» - Режим доступа: http://www.consultant.ru;
23. Международное право. Общая часть : учеб. для студентов юрид. фак. и вузов / И.И. Лукашук; Рос. акад. наук, Ин'т государства и права, Академ. правовой ун'т. — Изд. 3'е, перераб. и доп. — М. : Волтерс Клувер,
2005. — С. 123-125;
24. Международное право. Общая часть: учебник / Г.Я. Бакирова, П.Н. Бирюков, Р.М. Валеев и др.; отв. ред. Р.М. Валеев, Г.И. Курдюков. М.: Статут, 2011;
25. Рачков И.В. Всемирная торговая организация: право и институты: учебное пособие. Москва: Институт права и публичной политики, 2019 // Справочная правовая система «КонсультантПлюс» - Режим доступа: http://www.eonsultant.ru;
26. Смбатян А.С. Классификация мер как причины возникновения споров ВТО (часть II) // Право ВТО. - 2015. - N 2. - С. 11 - 27;
27. Смбатян А.С. Международные торговые споры в ГАТТ / ВТО: избранные решения (1952-2005 гг.) / А. С. Смбатян // М.: Волтерс Клувер. -
2006. - 326 с.;
28. Смбатян А.С. Процедура разрешения споров Всемирной торговой организации. // Право ВТО. - 2014. - № 2. - С. 23 - 45;
29. Трунк-Федорова М.П. Механизм разрешения споров в рамках ВТО и исполнение решений в этой области: дис. канд. юрид. наук: 12.00.10 [Электронный ресурс] // Российская государственная библиотека - Режим доступа: https://www.rsl.ru;
30. Alavi, A., African Countries and the WTO's Dispute Settlement Mechanism // Development Policy Review, 25: 25-42, 2007;
31. Ashok Kaul, Manuel Sehieler & Michael Wolf (2016) Standard of proof in WTO dispute settlement proceedings: an applied statistical perspective, The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 4:2, 304-305;
32. Bar Ilan University Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 18-01. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2997094;
33. Bown, C.P. The Economics of Trade Disputes, the GATT’s Article XXIII, and the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding // Economics & Politics, 2002. - P. 288;
34. Charnovitz Steve, The Enforcement of WTO Judgments, 34 Yale J. Int'l L. 558 (2009);
35. Charnovitz Steve, Transparency and Participation in the World Trade Organization / Steve Charnovitz // 56 Rutgers L. - 2004. - P. 4;
36. Cherise Valles, Vitaliy Pogoretskyy, Tatiana Yanguas, Challenging Unwritten Measures in the World Trade Organization: The Need for Clear Legal Standards // Journal of International Economic Law, Volume 22, Issue 3, September 2019, Pages 464-466;
37. Dr. Ahmad Momen Rad. Consultation in WTO Dispute Settlement System. January 18, 2014 // URL: http://momenirad.ir/en/articles/8-consultation- in-wto-dispute-settlement-system.html;
38. Gabrielle Z. Marceau, Jennifer K. Hawkins, Experts in WTO Dispute Settlement // Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 3, Issue 3, November 2012, Pages 497-500;
39. Gary N. Horlick & Glenn R. Butterton, A Problem of Process in WTO Jurisprudence: Identifying Disputed Issues in Panels and Consultations, 31. Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus. 573, 580 (2000);
40. Hoekman, Bernard & Mavroidis, Petros, WTO Dispute Settlement, Transparency and Surveillance // URL: https://www.researchgate.net;
41. Hoekman, Bernard & Mavroidis, Petros, WTO Dispute Settlement, Transparency and Surveillance // URL: https://www.researchgate.net;
42. Howse, ‘The Most Dangerous Branch? WTO Appellate Body Jurisprudence on the Nature and Limits of the Judicial Power’, in T. Cottier and P.C. Mavroidis (eds), The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation - Experience and Lessons for the WTO, World Trade Forum (2003), IV, at 11, 15;
43. Isabelle Van Damme, Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body // European Journal of International Law, Volume 21, Issue 3, August 2010, Page 613;
44. John H. Jackson, The Jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO: Insights on Treaty Law and Economic Relations // Cambridge University Press, 2000. - P.115;
45. MA Qian, ‘Reasonable Period of Time’ in the WTO Dispute Settlement System // Journal of International Economic Law, Volume 15, Issue 1, March 2012, Pages 257-285;
46. Merrills J.G.: International Dispute Settlement, 4th edition // Cambridge University Press, 2005;
47. Mitsuo Matsushita, Thomas Schoenbaum, Petros C. Mavroidis, Michael Hahn, The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy // Oxford University Press, 2015. - P. 51;
48. Parlin, C. Christopher., Operation of Consultations, Deterrence, and Mediation // Law &Policy in International Business. 2000. 31 (3): P. 565-572;
49. Petros C. Mavroidis, Trade in goods: the GATT and the other WTO agreements regulating trade in goods // Oxford University Press, 2009. - P. 48.
50. Reich, Arie, The Effectiveness of the WTO Dispute Settlement System: A Statistical Analysis (2017). EUI Department of Law Research Paper No. 2017/11;
51. Shaffer G. The challenges of WTO law: strategies for developing country adaptation // World Trade Review, 2006, 5: 2, P. 189 - 192;
52. Van den Bossche, P., & Zdouc, W, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases and Materials. // Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. - P. 168;
53. William J. Davey, The World Trade Organization’s Dispute Settlement System, 42 S. Tex. L. Rev. 1199, 1200 (2001);
54. William J. Davey, The WTO and Rules-Based Dispute Settlement: Historical Evolution, Operational Success, and Future Challenges // Journal of International Economic Law, Volume 17, Issue 3, September 2014, Page 696.
Решения третейских групп и апелляционного органа ВТО
55. Appellate Body Report, Argentina — Measures Affecting Imports of Footwear, Textiles, Apparel and other Items (1998) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
56. Appellate Body Report, Argentina — Measures Affecting the Importation of Goods (2015) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
57. Appellate Body Report, Australia — Measures Affecting Importation of Salmon (1998) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
58. Appellate Body Report, China - Measures Related to the Exportation of Various Raw Materials (2012) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
59. Appellate Body Report, China — Measures Related to the Exportation of Rare Earths, Tungsten and Molybdenum (2014) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
60. Appellate Body Report, European Communities — Export Subsidies on Sugar (2005) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
61. Appellate Body Report, European Communities — Measures Affecting Asbestos and Products Containing Asbestos (2001) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
62. Appellate Body Report, European Communities
Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones) (1998) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
63. Appellate Body Report, European Communities — Regime for the
Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas (1997) // URL:
https://www.wto.org/;
64. Appellate Body Report, European Communities — Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas - Second Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Ecuador (2008) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
65. Appellate Body Report, European Communities — Selected Customs Matters (2006) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
66. Appellate Body Report, European Communities — Trade Description of Sardines (2002) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
67. Appellate Body Report, European Communities and Certain member States — Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft (2011) // URL: https:// www.wto.org/;
68. Appellate Body Report, European Union — Anti-Dumping Measures on Biodiesel from Argentina (2016) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
69. Appellate Body Report, India — Measures Affecting the Automotive Sector (2002) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
70. Appellate Body Report, India — Patent Protection for Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Chemical Products (1998) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
71. Appellate Body Report, India — Quantitative Restrictions on Imports
of Agricultural, Textile and Industrial Products (1999) // URL:
https://www.wto.org/;
72. Appellate Body Report, Japan — Measures Affecting the Importation of Apples (2003) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
73. Appellate Body Report, Mexico — Anti-Dumping Investigation of High-Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) from the United States (2001) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
74. Appellate Body Report, Peru — Additional Duty on Imports of Certain Agricultural Products (2015) // URL: https://www.wto.org;
75. Appellate Body Report, Thailand — Customs and Fiscal Measures on Cigarettes from the Philippines (2011) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
76. Appellate Body Report, United States - Measures Affecting Imports of Woven Wool Shirts and Blouses from India (1997) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
77. Appellate Body Report, United States - Subsidies on Upland Cotton (2005) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
78. Appellate Body Report, United States - Sunset Review of Anti-Dumping Duties on Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Japan (2003) // URL: https://www.wto.org;
79. Appellate Body Report, United States — Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (2003) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
80. Appellate Body Report, United States — Continued Existence and Application of Zeroing Methodology // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
81. Appellate Body Report, United States — Countervailing Duties on Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Germany // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
82. Appellate Body Report, United States — Countervailing Measures Concerning Certain Products from the European Communities (2003) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
83. Appellate Body Report, United States — Import Measures on Certain Products from the European Communities (2001) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
84. Appellate Body Report, United States — Import Prohibition of
Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (1998) // URL: https://www.wto.org;
85. Appellate Body Report, United States — Laws, Regulations and Methodology for Calculating Dumping Margins (Zeroing) (2006) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
86. Appellate Body Report, United States — Measures Affecting Imports of Woven Wool Shirts and Blouses from India (1997) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
87. Appellate Body Report, United States — Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft — Second Complaint // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
88. Appellate Body Report, United States — Section 211 Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1998 (2002), para. 13 // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
89. Appellate Body Report, United States — Subsidies on Upland Cotton (2005) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
90. Appellate Body, United States - Anti-Dumping Act of 1916 (2000) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
91. Communication from the Appellate Body, United States — Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products, WT/ DS381/12, dated 22 March 2012 // URL: https://www.wto.org;
92. Communication from the Chair of the Panel, European Communities — Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products, WT/DS291/32, WT/DS292/26 and WT/DS293/26, dated 29 September 2006 // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
93. Dispute Settlement Body, Minutes of Meeting held on 23 July 2012, WT/DSB/M/320, dated 28 September 2012 // URL: https://www.wto.org;
94. GATT Panel Report, EEC - Restrictions on Imports of Dessert Apples (1989) // URL: http://www.worldtradelaw.net/;
95. GATT Panel Report, European Economic Community - Payments and Subsidies Paid to Processors and Producers of Oilseeds and Related Animal¬Feed Proteins (1990) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
96. GATT Panel Report, GATT Panel Report, Japan - Trade in Semi-Conductors (1988) // URL: http://www.worldtradelaw.net/;
97. Panel Report, Argentina — Definitive Anti-Dumping Duties on Poultry from Brazil (2003) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
98. Panel Report, Brazil — Measures Affecting Imports of Retreaded Tyres (2007) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;
99. Panel Report, Canada — Measures Affecting the Export of Civilian Aircraft (1999) // URL: https://www.wto.org/;

Купить