INTRODUCTION 7
CHAPTER 1. LITERATURE REVIEW ON INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL FACTORS AFFECTING CORPORATE CULTURE 11
1.1. Theoretical background based on Political Economy findings 11
1.2. Corporate Culture 13
1.3. Satisfaction of Employees with the Company as Individual-Level Factor Affecting Corporate Culture 21
1.4. Turnover Intention of Employees as Individual-Level Factor Affecting Corporate Culture 24
1.5. Perceived Autonomy of Employees from the Management of the Company as Individual-Level Factor Affecting Corporate Culture 26
1.6. Hypotheses and Research Model 28
CHAPTER 2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 30
2.1. Methodological Approach 30
2.2. Sample Description 32
2.3. Measurement 36
CHAPTER 3. RESULTS 44
3.1. Empirical Results 44
3.2. Discussion 50
3.3. Implications, Limitations and Directions for Future Research 52
CONCLUSION 54
BIBLIOGRAPHY 56
APPENDIX I. COMPLETE SURVEY SAMPLE 65
APPENDIX II. EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS OUTPUTS 79
APPENDIX III. CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS OUTPUTS 82
APPENDIX IV. HETEROSCEDASTICITY AND MULTICOLLINEARITY TESTS OUTPUTS 83
APPENDIX V. PAIRWISE COMPARISONS OF INDEPENDENT VARIABLES OUTPUTS 85
APPENDIX VI. MULTI-GROUP MODERATION ANALYSIS FOR EXPERIENCE
CONTROL VARIABLE 87
The corporate culture of an organization is a critical determinant of its success and sustainability (O’Reilly, Chatman, 1996)1. It encompasses the shared norms, values, beliefs, and practices that influence how employees interact with each other and with stakeholders outside the organization (Schein, 2010)2. A strong corporate culture fosters a sense of identity and belonging among employees, enhances their commitment and loyalty, and drives organizational performance (Kotter, 2012)3. However, the strength of corporate culture is not solely dependent on top-down initiatives from management; it is also significantly influenced by individual-level factors that reflect the attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors of employees (Hudson et al., 2017)4.
Understanding the effects of individual-level factors on the strength of corporate culture is crucial for several reasons. First, it provides insights into how individual-level factors contribute to or detract from the cohesiveness and effectiveness of the corporate culture (Lu et al., 2016)5. Second, it helps identify the optimal combination of factors that can be leveraged to strengthen corporate culture, thereby enhancing organizational resilience, adaptability, and competitiveness. Third, it offers practical guidance for managers and HR professionals on how to cultivate a positive and inclusive corporate culture that aligns with the organization's strategic goals and values (Kavanagh, Ashcanasy, 2006) .
Given the dynamic and complex nature of today's business environment, where organizations are constantly challenged by technological advancements, changing market demands, and evolving workforce expectations, the need to understand and effectively manage the determinants of strong corporate culture has never been more pressing. This research aims to fill this critical knowledge gap by empirically testing the impact of job satisfaction, employee turnover intentions, and employee autonomy on the strength of corporate culture.
Despite the recognized importance of corporate culture in organizational success, existing literature has predominantly focused on the role of leadership and management practices in shaping and sustaining corporate culture (Nahavandi, 2009; Baumgartner, 2009; Groysberg, 2018)789. While these studies have provided valuable insights, there is a notable gap in understanding the influence of individual-level factors on the strength of corporate culture. Specifically, there is limited empirical research that systematically examines how job satisfaction, employee turnover intentions, and sense of autonomy from management collectively impact the cohesiveness, resilience, and effectiveness of corporate culture.
Furthermore, most studies have treated these individual-level factors in isolation, overlooking the potential interactions and synergies between them that could amplify or mitigate their effects on corporate culture. As a result, there is a lack of comprehensive models that integrate these factors to identify the optimal combination that strengthens corporate culture within a company. This research seeks to address these gaps by adopting a quantitative approach to empirically test the effects of job satisfaction, employee turnover intentions, and employee autonomy on the strength of corporate culture. By doing so, it aims to contribute to the existing body of knowledge by providing a more nuanced understanding of the determinants of strong corporate culture and offering evidence-based recommendations for organizational leaders and HR professionals to foster a positive and inclusive corporate culture...
This research aimed to empirically investigate the effects of individual-level factors— specifically job satisfaction, employee turnover intentions, and employee autonomy—on the strength of corporate culture within a company. The study was motivated by the need to understand how these factors contribute to or detract from the cohesiveness and effectiveness of corporate culture, which is crucial for organizational resilience, adaptability, and competitiveness.
The analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between the initial level of job satisfaction among employees and the strength of corporate culture. This finding underscores the importance of ensuring high job satisfaction to foster a robust corporate culture. Employees who are satisfied with their jobs are more likely to align with the organization's values and contribute positively to its culture.
There was a significant negative relationship between employees' turnover intentions and the strength of corporate culture. High turnover intentions were found to weaken corporate culture, highlighting the need for organizations to address factors that contribute to employees' desires to leave. Reducing turnover intentions can help maintain a stable and cohesive corporate culture.
The study found a complex relationship between employee autonomy and the strength of corporate culture. While autonomy was negatively correlated with corporate culture when considered in isolation, its effect became insignificant when combined with job satisfaction and turnover intentions. This suggests that while autonomy is important, its impact on corporate culture is mediated by other factors such as job satisfaction.
This research contributes to the theoretical understanding of corporate culture by integrating concepts from political economic theory into corporate management. The adaptation of the Gehlbach model to the corporate context provides a novel framework for analyzing how individual-level factors influence corporate culture. This interdisciplinary approach enriches the existing literature and offers a new perspective on managing corporate culture.
For practitioners, the findings offer actionable insights into enhancing corporate culture. By focusing on improving job satisfaction and reducing turnover intentions, managers can strengthen corporate culture without relying heavily on financial incentives. This approach not only fosters a positive work environment but also enhances organizational performance and sustainability.
The study's limitations include its focus on a single company within a specific industry and geographical region, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Future research should consider a broader range of companies and industries, as well as cross-cultural comparisons, to validate and extend the findings. Additionally, longitudinal studies could provide deeper insights into the causal relationships between individual-level factors and corporate culture.
In conclusion, this research highlights the critical role of individual-level factors in shaping corporate culture. By understanding and managing these factors, organizations can cultivate a strong, cohesive, and effective corporate culture that supports their strategic goals and enhances overall performance. The study provides a foundation for further exploration and practical application in the field of corporate management.
1. Ahn, Y. (2022). Mission Match and Organizational Satisfaction: Testing the Mediating Role of Perceived Reputation. Public Personnel Management, 51, 355 - 379.
2. Ako, Dr. (2023). Effects of Anglophone crisis on employees’ work engagement before and during: A comparative analysis in The University of Bamenda. International Journal of Research in Human Resource Management. 5. 126-131. 10.33545/26633213.2023.v5.i1b.138.
3. Alam, M., & Singh, P. (2021). Performance feedback interviews as affective events: An exploration of the impact of emotion regulation of negative performance feedback on supervisor-employee dyads. Human Resource Management Review, 31(2), 100740.
4. Amah, E., Ahiauzu, A. (2013). Employee involvement and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Management Development, 32(7), 661-674.
5. Ashraf, M. A. (2019). The mediating role of work atmosphere in the relationship between supervisor cooperation, career growth and job satisfaction. Journal of Workplace Learning, 31(2), 78-94.
6. Ateeq, A.A., Alzoraiki, M., Milhem, M., & Al-Absy, M.S. (2023). Impact of employee loyalty on job performance: Mediating role of job satisfaction on the example of Zain company, Bahrain. Problems and Perspectives in Management.
7. Baumgartner, R. J. (2009). Organizational culture and leadership: Preconditions for the development of a sustainable corporation. Sustainable development, 17(2), 102-113.
8. Bellas, D., & Koustelios, A. (2014). Organizational culture and job satisfaction: A review. International review of management and marketing, 4(2), 132-149.
9. Brauninger, T., Marinov, N. (2022). Political elites and the “War on Truth’’, Journal of Public Economics, Volume 206
10. Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38(6), 551¬570. doi: 10.1177/001872678503800604
11. Bundy, J., Pfarrer, M., Short, C., Coombs, T. (2016). Crises and Crisis Management: Integration, Interpretation, and Research Development. Journal of Management. 43. 10.1177/0149206316680030.
12. Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture (3rd ed.). Jossey Bass Wiley.
13. Chanana, N., & Sangeeta. (2021). Employee engagement practices during COVID-19 lockdown. Journal of public affairs, 21(4), e2508.
14. Chapple, E., Walsh, K., & Shen, Y. (2020). Corporate Culture and Fraud. In Corporate Fraud Exposed. Emerald Publishing Limited.Papers.
15. Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of management journal, 34(3), 487-516...(110)