Introduction 3
1. Theoretical aspects of constitutionalization 7
§ 1.1 Constitutionalization in historical perspective 7
§ 1.2 The ways and the results of constitutionalization 19
2. The publicness of Private Law values. Realization of equality 25
§ 2.1 The constitutional principle of equality in contractual relations 25
§ 2.2 The impact of constitutional provisions on private property rights 37
3. The system of constitutional and legal regulation in the field of Patent Law. 51
§ 3.1The public-private nature of patents law 51
Conclusion 65
List of references 67
Relevance of research. The legal term "constitutionalization" is historically relevant and widely discussed in jurisprudence. Over time, the understanding of this phenomenon has changed, with active work on the study beginning at the end of the XX century and continues at the present time. A large number of works have been written about this term with each researcher and lawyer analyzing the term under a different vector and making his own conclusions. The relevance of this topic is not recent, as the grounds for the development of it were laid during the last century in the works of such scholars as Jellinek G ., Schneider C. E . and Butler A. S. . Among the most significant papers of western scholars can be noted the works of Gardbaum S. , Collins H. , Disant M. , Kumm A. . A great deal of attention has been paid to Russian-speaking scholars, in particular to the works of Gadzhiev G.A. , Ulbashev A. Kh. , Nevinskii V.V. , Lukasheva E.A. .
This study considers constitutionalization in relation to private law. The influence of modern constitutional law on private law is so profound that a separate term has appeared in legal science to denote the result of this influence.
The topic had been chosen because of its undeniable relevance. It is important to note that the relevance is explained not only by the intensive implementation of constitutional law into the sphere of private law, but also by the existence of problematic issues that have arisen at the present stage of development of this doctrine. For instance, it is a question of the historical peculiarities. It is worth noting the socialist tradition, which was characterized by the dominance of public law in legislation, the existence of which often led to ambiguity in distinguishing the relationship between public and private law . In this regard, there were and still are a lot of challenges in determining the boundaries between these two branches of law and resolving disputes arising in this regard. The following problems will be analyzed in this study.
The novelty of the phenomenon lies in the fact that constitutional rights and freedoms, as well as constitutional principles, initially did not have the goal of influencing private law relations, their goal was different, but at a certain stage in the development of public relations, the goals of private law regulation changed by themselves following the changing needs of society. Moreover, at the present stage there are not many works on the constitutionalization of private law. It is necessary to draw attention to this topic due to its complexity and multidimensionality. This approach enables to look at the traditional civilizational problems from a completely different perspective.
The main goal of the study is to analyze theoretical concept of constitutionalization, its normative framework in private legislation and corresponding case-law of Russian and foreign courts in this field.
To achieve this goal, the following objectives were defined:
• The analysis of scientific materials and determination of stages of development in historical perspective;
• The exploration of the ways and the results of implementation of constitutionalization;
• The consideration of the establishment of contractual relations based on the principle of equality;
• The analysis of private property rights and the impact of constitutional provisions;
• The exploration of the public-private nature of patents law;
• The summarizing of relevant problems and drafting proposals for their resolution.
...
The present research is an attempt made to comprehensively analyze the concept of constitutionalization of private law, which, undoubtedly, is of great importance in regulating relations at the present stage of jurisprudence development. The thesis outlined many concepts of formation and understanding of the constitutionalisation of private law, taking into account the historical and political background, as well as the peculiarities of a particular jurisdiction. Comparison of approaches to understanding gave an opportunity to study the issue more deeply and understand its essence.
The research consists of the analysis of the case-law arising from the difficulties of distinguishing between laws and legal interpretation. An important clarification is that these disputes are bound to involve a clash between private law norms and fundamental rights. Consideration and study of a wide range of issues in this area allows us to form general ideas about the totality of emerging legal relations and their features. The essence of the legal concept of constitutionalization lies not only in the legal nature of the institution, but also in the legal consequences arising from the implementation of constitutional law into private law.
Practice shows that the process of constitutionalization of private law began a long time ago. Noting the significance of this phenomenon, it is necessary to take into account ways to overcome the difficulties caused by the complexity and ambiguity of the nature of its practical implementation. In the modern period in Russia, this doctrine requires more detailed study and establishment of regulatory and legal limits.
The paper illustrated in detail the peculiarities of constitutionalisation of certain institutions of private law, such as relations arising in connection with property rights, patent rights and the analysis of contract law in terms of the doctrine of protection of the "weak" party. By exploring each aspect conclusions and general recommendations have been made.
While studying the institution of private property, the author believes that the solution to the challenges lies within the state, and the resolution is the necessity to maintain legislative stability. The state must protect the commonwealth, the implementation of fundamental rights and freedoms and constitutional guarantees. However, at the same time, the boundaries of state intervention, harmonization of such relations should be preserved.
Examining the jurisprudence of the courts it was found that it is still very difficult to establish the boundaries of this intervention and it is not clear what ' common welfare' encompassed. The same is notices in the patent law legislation. Thus, according to the opinion of the author of this study, it is necessary to amend the current legislation in the field of protection and use of inventions, utility models, industrial designs created with the participation of the state, the purpose of which is to ensure equal rights and respect for the interests of all participants of legal relations on the creation of results capable of legal protection, obtained at the expense of the budget. However, contrary to the presence of such a strong influence of public interests and the role of the state, as mentioned above, we note that the rights of private individuals should be properly protected in this area. Issues related to judicial decisions seem to be relevant.
The scientific study of the theories of constitutionalization is a task which needs a lot of attention. The doctrine of foreign States should be taken into account. This issue is particularly relevant in modern realities. Academic researches and involvement of lawmakers' awareness to this matter could bring clarity to many public relations arising in this regard.
1. Constitution of the Russian Federation (hereafter – RF) of 12 December 1993 (as amended on 14 of March 2020) // Rossiyskaya Gazeta [Russian Gazette]. – 1993. – 25 December;
2. Civil Code of the RF (pt. I): Federal Law of 30 November 1994 No. 51-FZ (as amended on 28 June 2021) // SZ RF. – 1994. – No. 32. – Item 3301;
3. Civil Code of the RF (pt. II): Federal Law of 26 January 1996 No. 14-FZ (as amended on 1 July 2021) // SZ RF. – 1996. – No. 5. – Item 410.
4. Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Pt. IV) of 18 December 2006, No. 230-FZ (rev. of 30 January 2024) // SZ RF. 2006. No. 52. Item 5496.
5. Code of the RF of Administrative Offenses: Federal Law of 30 December 2001 No. 195-FZ (as amended on 22 April 2024) // SZ RF. – 2002. – No. 1 (pt. I.). – Item 1.
6. South African Constitution of 8 May 1996 (as amended 22 April 2016)// URL: https://www.gov.za/documents/constitution/constitution-republic-south-africa-1996-1 (last visited: 01.05.2024)
7. United States of America. Constitution of September 17, 1787 // URL: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CDOC-110hdoc50/pdf/CDOC-110hdoc50.pdf (last visited: 01.04.2021).
8. Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 10 December 1948 // URL: https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/udhr.pdf (last visited: 01.03.2024).
9. Federal Republic of Germany. Basic Law of 23 May 1949 (as amended on 29 September 2020) // URL: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gg/ (last visited: 01.03.2024).
10. United Kingdom. Human Rights Act of 9 November 1998 (p. 42) // URL: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents (last visited: 01.05.2024).
11. On the Fundamentals of Legislation of the Russian Federation on Culture: Federal law of 9 October 1992 № 3612-1 (as amended 22.12.2023) // Vedomosti of the Congress of People's Deputies of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation.. 1992. – № 46. – Item. 2615.
12. On Protection of Competition: Federal Law of 26 July 2006 No135-FZ (as amended on 10 July 2023) // URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_61763/ (last visited 03.03.2024)
13. On the conduct of gardening and horticulture by citizens for their own needs and on amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation No 217-FZ (as amended on 24 July 2023)// SZ RF. – 2017 – No31. Item 4766.
14. On Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: International Covenant of 16 December 1966 // Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR [Bulletin of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR]. – 1976. – No. 17. – Item 291.
15. BVerfG. Lüth. Az. 1 BvR 400/51. Urteil des Ersten Senats vom 15. Januar 1958. §25. - URL: http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/1958/01/rs19580115_1bvr040051.html(last visited: 01.05.2024)
...
105 источников