Тип работы:
Предмет:
Язык работы:


An Empirical Study on M&A Performance of Luxury Industry

Работа №128180

Тип работы

Магистерская диссертация

Предмет

финансовый менеджмент

Объем работы58
Год сдачи2021
Стоимость5700 руб.
ПУБЛИКУЕТСЯ ВПЕРВЫЕ
Просмотрено
26
Не подходит работа?

Узнай цену на написание


An Empirical Study on M&A Performance of Luxury Industry Based on EVA 1
Introduction 9
Chapter 1 Literature Review 11
1.1 The concept of mergers and acquisitions 11
1.2 Six M&A waves 11
1.3 Classification of M&A 13
1.4 Luxury goods and luxury industry 15
1.5 Research on M&A motives, measurement and performance 19
1.5.1 Theories of M&A Motives 19
1.5.2 Research on M&A Performance Measurement Methods 22
1.5.3 Research on the influencing factors 23
Chapter 2 Empirical Analysis of M&A Performance Based on EVA 26
2.1 Hypotheses Statement 26
2.2 Principle of M&A performance evaluation using EVA 28
2.3 Data and sample 30
2.4 Adjusted EVA calculation 33
2.4.1 Accounting adjustment for NOPAT and capital employed 34
2.4.2 Capital employed calculation 35
2.4.3 WACC calculation 35
2.4.4 Adjusted EVA calculation result 36
2.4.5 Performance change trend analysis 37
2.5 Empirical analysis 40
2.5.1 Research methodology 40
2.5.2 Variable Definitions 41
2.5.3 Variable correlation test 42
2.5.4 Regression model results 42
2.6 Sub-sample analysis 45
2.7 Main findings and discussion 47
2.8 Managerial implications 47
2.9 Limitations and Recommendations 48
Conclusion 50
References 52
Appendices 55
Appendix 1 Zephyr filter criteria 55
Appendix 2 Adjusted NOPAT calculation result for example 55
Appendix 3 Adjusted NOPAT calculation result 56
Appendix 4 WACC result for all samples 57

The essence of M&A is to acquire the assets, equity, control or management rights of other enterprises through cash transactions, stock transactions, etc., which makes one enterprise gain the right to dominate another enterprise. M&A allows companies to take advantage of their own favorable conditions, such as brand value, market size, capital, corporate culture, etc., so that stock assets can be converted into incremental assets and capital appreciation can be achieved.
The actual birth of the luxury industry far predates its M&A development. In the 18th century, most of the luxury brands were small-scale production owned by families, and most of the brand owners were designers or artisans who made the products back to that time. The real boom in the luxury industry actually came after the Second World War, when various high-end brands such as Dior, YSL, Givenchy, etc. emerged. The golden period of the merger wave in the luxury industry started around 1980s, when conglomerates gradually emerged to replace family operations. This, coupled with the fact that "luxury" is a relative concept and there is no classification of the luxury industry in any database, makes it more difficult to study the industry as a whole, so most scholars focus only on case studies. Overall, the research on M&A in luxury industry is far behind other industries that emerged in the same time period, and the number of related studies is much smaller.
Moreover, in recent years, the scale of transactions of personal luxury goods (PLG) companies has further expanded, such as LVMH acquired Bulgari SpA, an Italian jewelry brand for 5.2 billion dollars in 2011 and acquired Tiffany & Co., an U.S. jewelry brand in2021 for 16.2billion dollars , both became the largest transaction of the decade at that time (Roberts, 2011). But do these high-value M&As in luxury industry really bring sufficient returns to the acquirer?
Therefore, the main questions to be answered in this thesis are: What impact does merger and acquisition have on luxury industry acquirers? What factors will affect the post-merger performance of luxury industry acquirers? How to adjust EVA? What is the relationship between EVA indicators and other performance indicators?
To sum up, the goal of this thesis is to investigate the impact of mergers and acquisitions on the performance of acquirers in the luxury industry by developing an EVA evaluation system and to identify the factors that influence post-merger performance.
In order to achieve the research goal, several objectives are set:
• Study the M&A related theories, especially these theories related to the characteristics of M&A in the luxury goods industry
• Review latest research on M&A performance, M&A performance influencing factors
• According to the content of the literature review, formulate hypotheses, establish methodology and models
• Determine the sample and collect data
• Run the regression model and give the result
• Give practical suggestions based on the results obtained
Zephyr, Thomson Reuters Eikon database, Statista and financial reports of the companies are used as the data source to examine the change of acquirer's M&A performance, and the time period for analysis is one year before the deal to the third year after the deal. So, the completion of M&A cannot be later than December 31, 2017. And after the economic crisis in 2007-2008, a change from crisis to recovery to new normal was formed in the luxury industry, which can provide a reference for the recovery of the luxury industry after COVID-19. Therefore, this thesis screens for M&A transactions in the luxury industry that were completed between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2017.
The first part of the thesis is the literature review, which focuses on the theory of M&A, its development and performance, motivations, influencing factors and research methods. The second part is an empirical analysis of the screened 39 luxury industry M&A deals that occurred during 2008-2017, based on the EVA system to analyze their M&A performance. The non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test is used to analyze the pre- and post-merger changes, and multiple linear regression is used to investigate the factors affecting the change in performance. Finally, managerial application and limitations and suggestions for future research are presented.


Возникли сложности?

Нужна помощь преподавателя?

Помощь в написании работ!


Investigating the impact of M&A on the performance of acquirer firms in the luxury industry is the main question that this thesis attempts to answer. In order to answer this question, the author conducts a detailed study on the theory of M&A, the influencing factors of M&A, the motivation of M&A, and the research methodology of M&A. With the help of the existing literature, the author identifies several factors that may have an impact on the post-merger performance of the luxury industry. The influencing factors are divided into two main aspects: firm characteristics and transaction characteristics.
Based on the literature review, the authors propose the main hypotheses of this study and validate the impact of M&A events on the performance of acquirer firms in the luxury industry and the factors that influence post-merger firm performance, respectively. The authors collected 39 luxury industry M&A transactions that occurred between 2008 and 2017 for an empirical study and established a multiple linear regression model, using characteristics such as the Goodwill-to-Total-Assets Ratio (acquirer), the Book-to- Market ratio(acquirer), the Debt-to-Equity Ratio(acquirer), the age(target), the transaction method as independent variables to examine the effects of the above independent variables on post-merger performance.
From the results of Wilcoxon test, it can be seen that the long-term effect of M&A on luxury industry is significant and positive. However, due to the sample size of this thesis, the short-term performance of the luxury industry cannot be effectively verified. In the attribution analysis, considering the specificity of the luxury industry, the author mainly selects the influencing factors through goodwill, market reaction and riskiness. In the empirical results, goodwill to total assets ratio and acquirer's age are positively related to post-merger performance, while the book to market ratio, D/E ratio, and cash payment is negatively related to post-merger performance. After several iterations, the five factors selected in this thesis were found to be statistically significant.
In the luxury industry, there is a clear first echelon of conglomerates, mainly LVMH, Kering and Richemont, and in order to investigate the specificity of conglomerates, the author conducted another analysis including only conglomerates (€10 billion of market capitalization as the criterion) in the sub-sample. The empirical results for the sub¬sample demonstrate that the effects of goodwill and leverage are more pronounced in the sub-sample than in the full sample. The goodwill to asset ratio has a much higher positive impact on post-merger performance and higher leverage has a higher negative impact on post-merger performance.
To conclude, the findings of this thesis conclusively demonstrate positive post¬merger changes in the overall performance of the luxury industry and the main factors influencing M&A in this industry. At the same time, the time period explored in this thesis, which began with the 2008 economic crisis, has always shown a positive recovery trend in the industry, and M&A has brought positive performance changes in the industry, suggesting that luxury acquirers can still draw on the post-2008 economic crisis experience for their M&A activities even after the COVID-19 pandemic.



Akther, R. (2014). Redefining the Meaning of Luxury Goods: A Conceptual Paper.
Alexandridis, G., Mavrovitis, C., & Travlos, N. (2012). How Have M&As Changed? Evidence from the Sixth Merger Wave. The European Journal of Finance, 663-688.
Atwal, G., & Williams, A. (2009). Luxury brand marketing — The experience is everything! Journal of Brand Management, 338-346.
Eastman, J., Goldsmith, R., & Flynn, L. R. (1999). Status Consumption in Consumer Behavior: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 41-52.
Harford, J. (2005). What drives merger waves? Journal of Financial Economics, 529-560.
Hogan, S., & Huie, M. (1992). Bigness, junk, and bust-ups: end of the fourth merger wave? The Antitrust Bulletin, 881-956. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X9203700403
International directory of company histories. Vol. 50. (2003). Detroit, Mich. : St. James Press. Retrieved from FUNDING UNIVERSE:
http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/united-states-steel-corporation- history/
Jovanovic, B., & Rousseau, P. (2001). Mergers and Technological Change: 1885-1998.
Pikulina, E. (2011). M&A waves and its evolution throughout history.
Roberts, A. (2011). LVMH to Acquire Bulgari After Agreeing to Buy Family Stake.
Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-03-07/bulgari-family- agrees-to-sell-a-controlling-stake-to-lvmh-in-share-swap
Stigler, G. J. (1950). Monopoly and Oligopoly by Merger. The American Economic Review, 23-34.
Varian, H. (1992). Microeconomic analysis. New York: Norton.
Agrawal, Sushil, & Jain. (2014, 12 17). Multiple Perspectives of Mergers and
Acquisitions Performance. Systemic Flexibility and Business Agility, pp. 385-398.
Aldaoud, T. (2015). M&A Towards a Global Reach Strategy:Cross-Border M&A Success and Failure: The Case of Daimler-Chrysler Merger.
Bick, P, Crook, M., Lynch, A., & Walkup, B. (2017). DOES DISTANCE MATTER IN MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS? The Journal of Financial Research, XL(1), 33-54.
Boone, A., Lie, E., & Liu, Y. (2014). Time trends and determinants of the method of payment in M&As. Journal of Corporate Finance, 27, 296-304. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.
Canina, L. (2000). The Effect o f Corporate Acquisitions on Stockholder Returns in the
Lodging Industry. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1813/71357
Chatterjee, S. (1986). Types of Synergy and Economic Value: The Impact of Acquisitions on Merging and Rival Firms. Wiley, Strategic Management Journal, 7(2), 119-139.
Das, A., & Kapil, S. (2012). Explaining M&A performance: a review of empirical research. Journal of Strategy and Management, Vol. 5(Iss: 3), pp. 284 - 330.
Dean, J. (1970). Causes and Consequences of Growth by Conglomerate Merger: An Introduction. St. John's Law Review, 44(5^, 15-36.
Faccio, M., & Masulis, R. W. (2005, Jun.). The Choice of Payment Method in European The Choice of Payment Method in European. The Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1345-1388. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3694929
Huang, Y.-S., & Walkling, R. (1987, December). Target abnormal returns associated with acquisition announcements: Payment, acquisition form, and managerial resistance.
Journal of Financial Economics, 19(2), 329-349.
Huang, Z., & Ye, X. (2018). Analysis of Merger & Acquisitions Motivation and Post Performance of Internet Corporations in China A Case Study of Youku Merger with
Tudou. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 132-137.
Kedia, S., Ravid, S. A., & Pons, V. (2011). When Do Vertical Mergers Create Value? Financial Management, 845-877. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23882749 Knoll, S. (2008). Cross-Business Synergies: A Typology of Cross-Business Synergies and a Mid-range Theory of Continuous Growth Synergy Realization. Springer Gabler. doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-9687-9
Kumar, B. (2019). Daimler-Chrysler Merger. Springer, Cham. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3 -03 0-02363 -8_44
Liu, T. (n.d.). The impact of cultural distance on long-term cross-border M&A performance: the Chinese case.
Liu, Y., & Ma, D. (2018). Research on the Correlation between Payment Methods of M&A and M&A Performance of Listed Company. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 10(6), pp. 90-96. doi:10.5539/ijef.v10n6p90
Meier, & Zello. (2008, 08 01). What is M&A performance? Academy of Management Perspectives, pp. 55-77.
Michael C., J., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Mielcarz, P., & Kalinowska, a. (2015). Methods of Payment in M&A Transactions and the Operational Performance of Acquirers. SSRNElectronic Journal, 739-746. Retrieved from Kalinowska, Aleksandra and Mielcarz, Pawel, Methods of Payment in M&A Transactions and the Operational Performance of Acquirers (March 31, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2419742 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2419742 Miller, D., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82(2. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076486 Motis, J. (2007). Mergers and Acquisitions Motives.
Mucenieks, K. (2018, January). Factors Affecting Mergers and Acquisitions in the European Union. doi:10.22364/hssl.26.2.7


Работу высылаем на протяжении 30 минут после оплаты.



Подобные работы


©2025 Cервис помощи студентам в выполнении работ